Friend paper

A) a brief summary of the “poor outcome” case you selected. Then explain the ethical principle(s)/codes the researcher violated and how. Also, suggest one strategy the researcher could have implemented and explain how this might have helped resolve the ethical dilemma. Also, comment on whether the dilemma would change if either the participant or the researcher is located outside of the United States. Finally, describe any outcomes the suggested strategy might cause, including additional dilemmas, and explain why. “Ethical Problem Solving in Research“

B) a description of three lessons related to IRB standards you took away from the tutorial. Explain how these lessons apply to your dissertation research. Then, describe one criterion of the IRB Checklist that surprised you and explain why.

4 pages.