I want to help me of this essay for Theories Of Communication

First I’m international student “Saudi Arabia”, and this my second language, and I want to help me for this Q3

3-5 Pg

————

i think you need to give specific points about EVT you added two type of expectancies that’s not in the book and it’s fine (with citation) Dr.Rogers layed outlines for us and i think it’s safe to go with that open an introduction with your thesis, what’s the out come of pat and julie attitude and tell what are you gonna do to prove that it’s as you said first paragraph should be only evt components of julie and pat for instance, how julie thinks about marrissa and pay before and how she thinks after like before she emphatize with marissa she thinks this this this. and then evt components for example, julie have a negative reward valence with marrissa back to julie perspective with marrissa, you will have to state evt components like before this happen julie has negative reward valence with marissa and also perceived marrissa’s actions as negative violation valence the results is she reciprocate that negativity a way(thinking in her head) so do this with JULIE to MARS before/after ( after she emphatize with marrissa she compensate) JULIE to PAT before/after PAT to JULIE before after then PAT to MARS (no before or after) then the second paragraph, you analyze the EVT components you just assessed in the first in behavior… what does julie think at first why is that why she altered her perspective to marrissa why she compensate for marrissa what she thinks about pat why is she compensate for him (JULIE to PAT i dont think there’s before and after tho because she always positive to PAT) for example, julie thinks pat is not bad he’s straightforward so she compensate with his violation valence in her mind like “he came from a police department, he’s having a hardtime doing managerial talk too and he used to be a cop or detective he’s probably good with investigation(inspection) she didn’t hate him and she compensate by saying he’s straightforward do it with PAT perspective too (it’s kinda tricky when analyzing how pat think of marrissa because it doesn’t say in the book how he “normally” treated her Oh PAT perspective should be in paragraph 3 tho because it’s will likely be too long and confusing if you put them together Then the conclusion – as you normally do just conclude the things that directly answer question 3 like the evt explains julie reaction to pat (at the end) like this she thinks of pat like this(reward valence) pat do like this(he changed his behavior toward julie) (violation valence) and then the result is she compensate for his action like this and then do the same for pat there’s a little bit tricky parts at the end but i think julie didn’t blame pat for that because of the final line (she knows that he must have felt wrong and despised her alittle) she said she’ll treat both of them good because she ended up compensate both of them and may be you should talk about how pat usually joke with julie because he knew the reward valence is positive (julie acted that way) and then he stopped because may be he saw her gossiping he may thinks julie also hate him complaining him deep down and he reciprocate he first compensate tho when julie recall about how he said it’s no big deal that she sent her work a day late