In April 2009 a young Canadian couple removed their baby from life support in order to save another baby in the same hospital who was in dire need of...

Question Answered step-by-step 1. In April 2009 a young Canadian couple removed their baby fromlife support in order to save another baby in the same hospital who was in dire need of a heart. The first baby was born with a brain malformation that prevented her from being able to breathe without a respirator and that was deemed “incompatible with life.” The parents stated that they would take comfort knowing their daughter’s organs would save the life of another child. Once off the respirator, however, the baby continued to breathe on her own, putting the heart donation on hold. Do you think that the parents acted ethically? Should a family be allowed to select an organ recipient? Should the family have made the decision to remove their baby from life support based solely on wanting to make her heart available to someone else? Does the principle of double effect apply here? Health Science Science Nursing HRM 101 Share QuestionEmailCopy link Comments (0)