Review “White Collar Crimes and the Dilemmas of Corporate Control” on p. 161-173 from the book “business law” 16th edition, and research two examples of white collar crime using the Internet. Tips: You could research Enron, Arthur Andersen, the Erin Brockovich case, Tyco and Dennis Kozlowski, the Teledyne case, potential liability of CEOs of financial institutions for misrepresentation, the Maddoff Ponzi scheme, etc. To go beyond a regular internet search, you could try Google Scholar — https://scholar.google.com. Please list any websites you quote or cite at the bottom of your comments using APA style. Please limit your comments to 500 words or less

1 page presentation draft explanation in word file about your PPT

5-7 PPT

Choose and become familiar with an article or book chapter in the area of strategic management authored by a current leader. Some authors to consider include: Daniel Pink, Malcolm Gladwell, Jim Collins, Gary Hamel, Sheryl Sandberg, Philip Kotler, Daniel Goleman, Warren Bennis, Thomas Friedman. NOTE – This is NOT an exclusive list – please feel free to research other authors especially those published in the Harvard Business Review. Authors may be repeated, but not specific articles/chapters – these must vary.

1. As the class expert, create and record a brief 5-7 slide PowerPoint presentation

• this theory in an interesting and informative manner and provides
• background information on the author – in other words, why is he/she considered a “guru” in this field?

2. Create a post that includes your Powerpoint file and a link to your reference or upload a copy. Post your Expert Profile by the end of this week. The title of your post should be the name of your expert. [E.g., Michael Porter]

3. Read and respond to at least 3 of your peers with an analysis of how this author’s contribution is critical to the success of strategic management. Responses due by end of next week.

Savethis worksheet to your computer with the filename “Your_Name_Exercise_3.”

Reviewthe Using Sources Effectively in Academic Writing tutorial for guidance.

Completethe table in Part 1 by doing the following:

• Copy and paste the paragraph you wrote in Day 1 Exercise 2 into the table below.
• Locate one peer-reviewed source in the University Library from EBSCOhost based on the topic of your paragraph.
• Insert a paraphrase, direct quotation, or summary into your paragraph using the peer-reviewed source.
• Create an APA-formatted in-text citation for the peer-reviewed source.

Completethe table in Part 2 by doing the following:

• Create an APA-formatted reference for the peer-reviewed source.

Submit the completed worksheet as an attachment.

Part 1

Part 2

Jasper robs the home of Peter and Carly, two meth dealers. He steals expensive jewelry, meth equipment, and meth. You are the assigned detective to
the robbery and receive a reliable tip that Jasper has stashed the goods in his home. You want to use thermal imaging to detect the presence of the stolen items.
A senior detective advises you that you do not need a warrant. Based upon your reading of Kyllo v. United States, what should you do? How does the court’s
decision reinforce ethical behavior and constitutional limits on law-enforcement officers? Write a journal assignment that addresses these questions. Refer to
your textbook and relevant scholarly sources to support the points and observations made in your journal assignment.
Guidelines for Submission: Your journal assignment must be 300–400 words (excluding the references). Citations should be formatted according to APA style.
Submit assignment as a Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins.

CASE SUMMERIE:::::::::

Procedural Posture

Petitioner was indicted of manufacturing marijuana after police discovered an indoor growing operation using a thermal-imaging device from the street. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of petitioner’s motion to suppress. Petition for writ of certiorari was granted to determine whether the thermal-imaging was a search under U.S. Const. amend. IV.

Overview

The police had aimed a thermal-imaging device at petitioner’s residence after a police detective suspected that petitioner was growing marijuana. Based on the thermal-imaging information, police obtained a search warrant for the residence. The lower court held that petitioner had shown no subjective expectation of privacy as he had made no attempt to conceal the heat escaping from his home and even if he had, there was no objectively reasonable expectation of privacy because the imager did not expose any intimate details of petitioner’s life. The appellate court concluded that obtaining information regarding the interior of the home that could not otherwise have been obtained without physical intrusion into a constitutionally protected area, such as petitioner’s private residence, constituted a search, at least where the technology was not in general public use. Since thermal imaging technology was not in general public use, such a surveillance was a search and was presumptively unreasonable without a warrant. Whether the search warrant was supported by probable cause without the surveillance evidence was for the trial court to determine in the first instance.

Outcome

Judgment was reversed and the case was remanded.