Need help with Experiential assignment

No directly quoted material may be used in this project paper.

Resources should be summarized or paraphrased with appropriate in-text and Resource page citations.

In this project, you will conduct one of the following: practitioner interview, criminal court visit, police ride-along, or correctional facility visit.

Practitioner Interview

Your task is to interview an individual of your choice involved in the criminal justice system: a police officer, attorney, judge, probation officer, researcher, current or former inmate, etc. (Note: Military personnel have the option of interviewing an equivalent person in the military.) Should your “expert” not be listed here, contact your instructor.

1) Provide the purpose of the paper and background information on the selected person.

2) Record the person’s views on the criminal justice system—whether the criminal justice system works, in what ways it doesn’t work, and the future of the criminal justice system.

3) Write the paper in a narrative format, detailing what you learned as the result of speaking with this person. Do not submit a “question-answer” paper.

4) Compare and contrast what your expert practitioner had to say with relevant instructional material from this course. Additionally, include one outside source that either supports or challenges what your expert practitioner said.

5) When using the instructional material or other sources, properly document and reference them, and cite all web sources. You must include the name your practitioner.

Criminal Court Visit

Your task is to visit a criminal court session. (Note: Military personnel have the option of visiting the military equivalent.) Depending on when you attend, you could see a series of cases or only one case. Write your reflections on what you observed and how the proceedings seemed to affect the administration of justice.

1) Begin with a cover page with your name, project title, course, and date submitted.

2) Write an introductory section explaining the purpose of the paper.

3) Write your reflections on what you observed and how the proceedings seemed to affect the administration of justice.

4) Compare and contrast what you observed with relevant material. Additionally, include one outside source that either supports or challenges what you observed.

5) When using the text or other sources, properly document and reference them. The name of the court you visited must be included.

Police Ride-Along

This is an observational assignment that focuses on the use of discretion by the police officers who patrol our communities. (Note: Military personnel may participate in a ride-along with a military police officer.) Your task is to ride with a police officer for a few hours and observe who is stopped and why. Who is arrested and why? How does the use of discretion play into the patrol officer’s job?

1) Begin with a cover page with your name, project title, course, and date submitted.

2) Write an introductory section that includes the purpose of the paper and information on the assignment of the officer, his or her department, and the date, time, and duration of the ride-along.

3) Using a narrative format, provide the officer’s views on the use of discretion in his or her job, then follow this with your observations and conclusions based on his or her performance. Use the questions above to guide your observations and questions.

4) Use research information from class materials to analyze the information obtained. Additionally, include one outside source that either supports or challenges what your officer said.

5) When using the text or other sources properly document and reference them. The name of your officer must be included.

Correctional Facility Visit

Your task is to visit a correctional facility (adult, juvenile, military) and compare and contrast what you see with what the text indicates.

1) Begin with a cover page with your name, project title, course, and date submitted. 2) Write an introduction that provides the purpose of the paper and information concerning the facility visited.

2) If possible, interview residents, administrators, and correctional officers. How do they view the correctional process? What are the pros and cons of the types of facilities we have in the United States? How has corrections changed over the past ten years?

3) Write the information down in a narrative format.

4) Compare and contrast the information obtained with course material. Additionally, include one outside source that either supports or challenges what you observed.

5) When using the text or other sources properly document and reference them. The name of the correctional facility you visited must be included.

Format Requirements for all Experiential Project reports

· Paper must be a minimum of 1,500 words No less preferebly more

· Double space

· 12 pt. font

· 1” margins

· Use APA citations for all sources

· Include reference page (not included in word count)

Additionally –

· Create a cover page for your assignment (not included in word count)

· Include your name

· Course title and number

· Project title

· Topic selected

· Date of submission

Must follow Rubrics to receive the highest grade.

NO plagerism

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-12 hours? PAY FOR YOUR FIRST ORDER AFTER COMPLETION..

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Do you have an upcoming essay or assignment due?

Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

If yes Order Paper Now

MDC Narcan and Needle Exchange Programs Should Not Be Funded by GOVT Money Discussion

Topic: Narcan and needle exchange programs should not be funded by government money.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-12 hours? PAY FOR YOUR FIRST ORDER AFTER COMPLETION..

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Do you have an upcoming essay or assignment due?

Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

If yes Order Paper Now

Palm and California Hands Free Law” , management homework help

Here are links for a news story that played out in 2008:

Palm and California Hands Free Law”


“Palm Supports California Bill Forcing Drivers to Put Phones Down”

http://www.dailytech.com/Palm+Supports+California+Bill+Forcing+Drivers+to+Put+Phones+Down/article4194.htm

“Simitian: ‘Hands-free Law Saving Lives’

http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/category/sacrament/california-state-senate/joe-simitian/

Hands-free is not Risk Free”

http://www.nsc.org/learn/NSC-Initiatives/Pages/distracted-driving-hands-free-is-not-risk-freeinfographic.aspx

Screen the video and read the articles. NOTE: Joe Simitian and Mary Doyle have known each other since they were both members of
Junior Statesmen of America in the early 1970s.

THE ASSIGNMENT:
Write an essay of around 600 words but no less than 550 and no more than 650 words
commenting on the story the materials above have to tell. Base your essay on your understanding
of history of how politics has been done and how it has evolved in California since the state
ratified its first constitution in 1849. This means that history must be the lens through which you
examine this story. You should be sure that most of your essay is about establishing the meaning
of that history in relation to the hands-free law.
As you will have only 600 words, you must focus your argument carefully by starting with a
well-crafted thesis.
For evidence to support your argument, your response must rely on the materials, lectures, and
videos we have encountered in this class. Apt use of this evidence will be one of the key
hallmarks of an excellent response. YOUR ARGUMENT MUST RELY ENTIRELY ON
YOUR HISTORICAL KNOWLEDGE OF WHAT YOU HAVE LEARNED ABOUT
THE HISTORY OF CALIFORNIA POLITICS & POWER OVER THE COURSE OF
THE PAST TWO WEEKS. You may relate this history to some of the arguments being
made or some of the above materials, but your argument must mainly draw on a historical
perspective. The richer your historical argument, the higher your evaluation will be.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-12 hours? PAY FOR YOUR FIRST ORDER AFTER COMPLETION..

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Do you have an upcoming essay or assignment due?

Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

If yes Order Paper Now

Unit 10 d 1

The Changing Face of Aging

It used to be that population resembled a pyramid, with the greatest numbers of people being very young and the smallest numbers being very old. Now; however, we see more of a rectangle as older adults, especially centenarians, become one of the fastest growing segments of the overall population. One of the more interesting discoveries about centenarians is that they tend to be in good health (Boston University School of Medicine, n.d.).

After reviewing one of the centenarian studies and the readings from the text for this unit, explain why centenarian studies are important to understanding aging.

Reference

Boston University School of Medicine. (n.d.). Why study centenarians? An overview of the New England Centenarian Study. Retrieved from http://www.bumc.bu.edu/centenarian/overview/

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-12 hours? PAY FOR YOUR FIRST ORDER AFTER COMPLETION..

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Do you have an upcoming essay or assignment due?

Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

If yes Order Paper Now

Messiah What Are Some Beliefs that You Have About Diversity and Inclusion Questions

A cohesive and descriptive philosophy statement is part of the career path that will stay with you and evolve as you grow professionally.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-12 hours? PAY FOR YOUR FIRST ORDER AFTER COMPLETION..

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Do you have an upcoming essay or assignment due?

Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

If yes Order Paper Now

CRJ 306 week 5 D1

One area of the law essential to understand is the concept of lesser included offenses. In this discussion, address the following prompts:

  • Define the criminal justice legal term of lesser included offense.
  • Assess how courts determine whether a crime is a lesser included offense.
  • Explain whether someone can be convicted for multiple crimes for one act.
  • Evaluate how lesser included offenses do not violate the double jeopardy clause of the 5th Amendment.
  • Examine the material elements of crimes and how they can vary to allow for multiple prosecutions for the same acts or similar offenses. Provide specific examples to support your answer.

Guided Response: Your initial post must be at least 300 words in length. Support your claims with examples from the required materials and/or other scholarly resources, and properly cite any references.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-12 hours? PAY FOR YOUR FIRST ORDER AFTER COMPLETION..

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Do you have an upcoming essay or assignment due?

Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

If yes Order Paper Now

key family dynamics, relationship triangles, and relationship processes within your family

Conduct an interview with one or both of your parents about your family history. If family is not available to interview, please see your instructor for suggestions. If this is not possible, consider interviewing your spouse’s parents or another older family member such as grandparents, uncles, aunts, etc.

Note key family dynamics, relationship triangles, and relationship processes (instances of emotional fusion or reactive distancing, general level of differentiation in the family, etc.). Be sure to ask couples how they met and about their courtship.

Present your findings in an informal paper of 500-750 words.

Conclude by reflecting on your experience. Did the Bowen structure shed light on any family structures previously unknown?

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%

2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%

3
Satisfactory
79.00%

4
Good
87.00%

5
Excellent
100.00%

70.0 %Content

40.0 %Present Interview Findings

Essay omits or incompletely describes findings from the interview conducted including family dynamics, relationship triangles, and relationship processes. Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

Essay inadequately describes findings from the interview conducted including family dynamics, relationship triangles, and relationship processes, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.

Essay adequately describes findings from the interview conducted including family dynamics, relationship triangles, and relationship processes, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

Essay clearly describes findings from the interview conducted including family dynamics, relationship triangles, and relationship processes, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.

Essay expertly describes findings from the interview conducted including family dynamics, relationship triangles, and relationship processes, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

30.0 %Reflection on Experience

Essay omits or incompletely describes a reflection on the interview experience. Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

Essay inadequately describes a reflection on the interview experience, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.

Essay adequately describes a reflection on the interview experience, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

Essay clearly describes a reflection on the interview experience, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.

Essay expertly describes a reflection on the interview experience, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %Format

5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are not documented.

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

100 %

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-12 hours? PAY FOR YOUR FIRST ORDER AFTER COMPLETION..

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Do you have an upcoming essay or assignment due?

Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

If yes Order Paper Now

SWOT Analysis for Management, Mentoring, and Nursing

Topic 1: Peer Evaluations

In this week’s discussion, you will be assigned a EBP by the instructor. You will perform a SWOT analysis on this peer’s Evidence-Based Practice Project (EBP) and post your analysis in the Discussion Board.

SWOT for Management, Mentoring, and Nursing

SWOT analysis is a process that can provide evidence of what is effective and what is not in clinical systems, procedures, or interventions. SWOT can be quite useful not only in planning projects, but also evaluating them.

Definitions of SWOT

  • Strengths – Internal factors that are likely to have a positive effect or facilitate in achieving the project’s objectives
  • Weaknesses – Internal factors that are likely to have a negative effect or facilitate in achieving the project’s objectives
  • Opportunities – External Factors that are likely to have a positive effect on achieving or exceeding the project goals
  • Threats – External Factors and conditions that are likely to have a negative effect on achieving the objectives, or making the objective redundant or unachievable

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-12 hours? PAY FOR YOUR FIRST ORDER AFTER COMPLETION..

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Do you have an upcoming essay or assignment due?

Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

If yes Order Paper Now

Assignment: Annotations

To start our Essay 1 unit, we are reading this week: “Welcome to Your Authentic Indian ExperienceTM” by Rebecca Roanhorse and “What is the Morally Appropriate Language in Which to Read and Write?” by Arundhati Roy. One thing to keep in mind is that Roanhorse uses the term authentic and Roy uses the term Appropriate, but they are intact speaking about the same thing.

You can find them in our class reader. These readings focus on the authors’ relationship with language and to an extent reading. After you have read and annotated both pieces, please submit an annotation worksheet which I have supplied.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-12 hours? PAY FOR YOUR FIRST ORDER AFTER COMPLETION..

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Do you have an upcoming essay or assignment due?

Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

If yes Order Paper Now

UP Standards of Care Discussion

Why are standards of care required for health care professionals and organizations? Explain.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-12 hours? PAY FOR YOUR FIRST ORDER AFTER COMPLETION..

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Do you have an upcoming essay or assignment due?

Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

If yes Order Paper Now