I have a small research paper, its 5 pages ( 2 pages screenshots, 2 pages writing, and one work consulted page). It is pretty easy once you read the requirements. And it is WORK CONSULTED PAGE, not work cited.

1. For this assignment, research two of the experts listed below who are in the Discovery Channel program to determine his/her credibility in his/her field, and post your findings here BEFORE you view the programs. The main purpose of the assignment is to discover and document your steps in determining how websites are or are not credible. Check at least 5 websites for each person when doing your research. Please prepare a Works Consulted page in proper MLA 8 format. Please see the attached for more detailed instructions. If you quote from any of your sources in your report, please prepare a Works Cited page and use proper intent citations.

More detailed directions:

Discovery Channel Program Exercise in Support and Credibility of Experts by Googling — minimum 5 pages of writing (approx. 1250 words) for each person you research

How can you tell which online information comes from reliable authorities? Anytime you use someone else’s words or ideas in your writing or formal speaking you should be aware who that person is; you can start now investigating the reliability of any sources you are thinking of quoting or paraphrasing.

We like to think that if information is in print, it is reliable. Unfortunately, that is not always the case. People with unjust biases and even those who want to sow hatred find their way into print. In general, works that appear in print go through a much more extensive vetting process than what appears online, but there are so-called vanity presses that will publish pretty much anything if the author will pay the cost. There are also all sorts of periodicals that express slanted—and often conflicting—points of view, some of them offensive to many of us. That’s what comes of freedom of the press.

When you go online, how can you start to weed through a list of results to find reliable authorities? For one thing, you can learn to “read” the list of results you get from Google or other search engines.

Please document the following by taking screen shots and explaining in prose as you work through your research in order to discover the possible credibility of two of the experts from the list. Please number each part of your assignment.

1. Choose two:

Dr. Robert Folk, a geologist

Dr. Monica Grady, a meteorite specialist

Dr. Michael Persinger, neurologist and geologist

Dr. Joe Nickell, a paranormal investigator

Dr. David M. Jacobs, an historian

Dr. Jack Cohen, a reproductive biologist

Garry Wood, an ambulance driver in Edinburgh, Scotland

1. Take a screen shot of the list of links that appear. Be sure to post this and all other screen shots in your paper. Before you click on a link, examine the first ten to fifteen entries in the resulting list. Yes, you may use Wikipedia as one source for this assignment. Look at each URL and see what you can learn from it. Also notice any other information that might affect your opinion of the source’s reliability or objectivity.

• Are there sources that you immediately trust as reliable? Which ones, and why?
• Are there any that you immediately assume will present a biased perspective? Which ones, and why?
• Are there any that are completely unfamiliar to you? If so, choose two or three and speculate what type of source each might be.

1. Now click on a couple of the sources that you trusted as being reliable. Identify exactly who wrote the document that you have accessed. If you cannot find an author, what does that suggest? If there is an author, search that person’s name and see if you find convincing credentials that support the assumption that he or she is qualified to write on the subject at hand.
2. Do the same with at least two sources that you predicted would be biased. Does further investigation support your assumption?
3. Go to at least one of the sources that were unfamiliar to you. Once you look more closely at the source, do you find any evidence of its reliability or lack thereof? Explain.
4. Based on your research, do you think the expert is credible in his/her field? Give at least two examples why.

Cultural differences and personality differences can impact cooperation. Team building is an important aspect of communication. Consider some aspects of culture and personality that may impact how people work together.

Research the importance of teamwork and the impact of personal and cultural differences on team building using your textbook, the Argosy University online library resources, and the Internet.

Situation:

After you helped your company, Labolg, prepare for expansion into other countries, the chief operating officer (COO) approaches you and tells you that she feels the differences among team members is negatively affecting production. She asks if you have any ideas for productive ways to work with the differences in their organization.

Analyze the situation and prepare a recommendation for the COO. State any assumptions you make about the nature of differences in the team.

Write a two- to three-page paper in Word format. Apply APA standards for writing style to your work. Use the following file naming convention: LastnameFirstInitial_M1_A3.doc.

By the due date assigned, deliver your assignment to the Submissions Area.

The textbook discusses the process of assimilation. After viewing the film, Indian School: Stories of Survival, answer the following questions:

1. What is the definition of assimilation?
2. What happened to the Native American children in the film?
3. Why did the American government decide to assimilate them into Western culture?
4. How did this affect them long term?
5. Is assimilating others into another culture ever justified?

Your initial post should be at least 250 words in length. Support your claims with examples from the required material(s) and/or other scholarly resources, and properly cite any references. Respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts by Day 7.

1. Givens, S. F. (Producer). (2011). Indian school: Stories of survival [Video]. Lincoln Park, MI: American Indian Services, Inc. Retrieved from the Films On Demand database.
   • This film discusses the United States government’s plan to systematically eradicate Native American culture by removing Native American children from their homes and putting them into Indian schools, where they would be acculturated into Western culture.

MAKE SURE TO READ THESE INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY

An important aspect of philosophical thinking is the ability to do conceptual analysis. Greta Christin‘s paper is a great example of this. Throughout her paper, she proposes a definition of sex, discusses how that definition captures several cases that intuitively count as sex, but then discusses some more complicated cases that either show that the definition is too broad (i.e., it includes or counts some case as an instance of sex when intuitively it should not) or too narrow (i.e., it excludes some case from counting as an instance of sex when we intuitively think it should count).

This paper assignment is divided into two parts.

Part one:

Expand on one of Greta Christina’s several different definitions of sex and explain how that definition is problematic. For example, Christina says, “Perhaps having sex with someone is the conscious, consenting, mutually acknowledged pursuit of shared sexual pleasure.” You might explain this definition (or one of the other ones that she considers) by giving a (fictional) example and showing how it exemplifies each of the features listed in the definition. Then, you should explain why that definition is problematic. For example, you could explain how there are cases that we intuitively count (or don’t count) as sex but aren’t (or are) counted as sex according to the definition (i.e., state whether the definition is too broad or too narrow, or both, and show how).

Part Two

Propose your own definition — a definition of sex that Christina does not consider. Show how that definition might handle some of the complicated cases that she discusses. Then, clearly state what the shortcomings of your proposed definition might be. For example, you should clearly state how the definition could be too broad or too narrow (or both) by presenting relevant counterexamples.

No copy accept! good organization with my paper! remember to read the article before you write the essay !!!

My US history class has a speech to do. The class is about constitution before 1877. Everyone has a role for giving speech on some issues for NY ratification. My role is an anti-federalist. I need to speak about the ”the right of recall” of the delegate or state representatives. Write a speech about “recall” in the view of an anti-federalist. The view of Anti-federalists on “recall” must be addressed.

Recall, , serves somewhat the same purpose as rotation, but is punitive in its design and
execution. Likely recall will rarely be exercised, since the mere threat of the same should suffice to
prevent representatives from forgetting who their real masters are. Antifederalists put great store by
this power, which applies especially to upper-house senators, since their terms are so much longer
than lower-house representatives. Recommended sources are:

NYC speeches by John Lansing, June 24, Debates, pp. 294-95, 299-300, 308
NYC speech by Melancton Smith, June 25, Debates, pp. 311-15
“Federal Farmer,” XI, CA-F (2.8.147)

Surprise Argument:

The Federalist Virginia Plan presented to the Constitutional Convention included a recall (and
rotation) provision in its 4th resolution. Use again as a debating point, the purpose of which is to
embarrass. See:

Notes, May 29, p. 31

I will upload the instruction of the role. I need to do issue 6 – recall. please write the speech in the view of an anti-federalist in the convention. We are having a debate between federalists and anti federalist. The goal is to convince moderate to vote for us(anti-federalist) in the convention