This article can be on any topic that interests you, so long as it pertains to American history in some way and falls into the time frame if this class [1865 – 2016].

After selecting your article you will answer the following questions:

1. Summarize the Article: What is the author discussing in this article? What is the argument/main point that the author is trying to make?

2. Evidence: What type of evidence does the author use to support their argument/main point. What do they use in their bibliography – newspapers, speeches, written histories? Are there any types of evidence you feel the author could have used to reinforce their argument?

3. Analyze the Article: After writing about the main point and type of evidence, answer if you thought the author made a convincing argument? Do you agree or disagree with the conclusions of the article? Why or why not?

4. Further Research: After reviewing your article do a little more research on this topic. Name one or two more articles that address similar subjects and see if they have a similar argument or different? Do they share the same sources?

All essays must be typed in 12 point, Times New Roman font using 1-inch margins. All papers must be double-spaced, grammatically correct, and refer back to the journal article you selected.

Please include a citation of your article at the top of your paper! use MLA citation

Each question should be a new heading in the paper. I do not expect a flowing narrative with this assignment. Instead, I want you to simply provide the answers to the questions above in roughly 2-3 paragraphs per question.

You do not need to refer to any class readings or lectures in your answers. Nor should you use Google or Wikipedia in your answers. I only want to see your thoughts on the article you select.

use the reading to answer all the question and there is a sample to take a view.

Review the Airbus 330 accident that occurred on 24 August 2001 in Terceira, Azores, Portugal, and share your views on this accident investigation conducted by the Portugal Aviation Accidents Prevention and Investigation Department.

Discussion Resources

Accident Investigation Final Report – All Engines-out Landing Due to Fuel Exhaustion (链接到外部网站。)链接到外部网站。

Discussion Questions

Respond to each of the following questions in your discussion post:

1. What engine systems were associated with this accident?
2. How was the investigation conducted (e.g., allowing the engine manufacture to participate or consult during the investigation)?
3. What, if any, Airworthiness Bulletin or Service Bulletin may have been associated with this accident?
4. What, if any, other investigation techniques would you have performed?
5. Based on the investigation recommendations, what other recommendations would you consider for the system to prevent another occurrence?

For test two you will need to choose 3 of the following topics for essay responses:You may use a work of art from your essay/presentation but you cannot use the entire thesis. You must provide detailed definitions of the styles and detailed analysis of the examples – that is why you have the questions ahead of time! Please do not use outside sources other than the text for this test. Information downloaded from online sites will not be accepted.

1. compare and contrast the ancient greek view of humanity to that of the renaissance view of humanity – 1 specific exampleof each must be used

2. compare and contrast the northern and southern renaissance – again, an example of each must be analyzed and included in the comparison

3. choose a Baroque artist and using 3 works discuss his/her style as seen in all 3 – should also explain how it exemplifies Baroque

4. same as above but use a Renaissance artist

5. compare and contrast the Renaissance to the Baroque style – using an example from each

Once we match, I have E-book or if you have the text book that I droped on files.

Please do a paragraph about this post with this instruction .

post most have 4 or more sentences .

you also have to have a high quality post from a content perspective. This means it also needs to do more than agree with or praise a class mate. If you agree with a classmate, explain why, give an example, share what you learned in the reading

Power is the ability to influence others. When one hears the word “power” it can either have negative or positive feelings. In both research and practice, power has been described as a dirty word (Lunenburg, 2012). More than 50 years ago social scientists John French and Bertrand Raven proposed five sources of power within organizations: legitimate, reward, coercive, expert, and referent (Lunenburg, 2012).

• Legitimate– a person’s ability to influence others’ behavior because of the position that person holds within the organization. Legitimate or positional power, as it is sometimes called, is derived from a position of authority inside the organization, often referred to as “formal authority” (Lunenburg, 2012).
• Rewards– a person’s ability to influence others’ behavior by providing them with things they want to receive. These rewards can be either financial, such as pay raises or bonuses or nonfinancial, including promotions, favorable work assignments, more responsibility, new equipment, praise, and recognition.
• Coercive– a person’s ability to influence others’ behavior by punishing them or by creating a perceived threat to do so. For example, employees may comply with a manager’s directive because of fear or threat of punishment.
• Expert– a person’s ability to influence others’ behavior because of recognized knowledge, skills, or abilities.
• Referent– a person’s ability to influence others’ behavior because they like, admire, and respect the individual.

There can be no leadership without influence, because influence is how leaders lead. Leaders understand that a primary part of their job is to influence others towards a desired outcome. One of the most successful approaches to leading others is to lead from a strong set of values (Hoff, 2014). Values are the fundamental components of a person’s beliefs, the concepts that they hold most dear and that drive decision making (Hoff, 2014). When a leader takes the time to identify her deepest values they are likely to make satisfying choices and remain consistent in her actions and choices. Moreover, they are effective in articulating values then others will understand her reasoning and, more often than not, be more inclined to support her process (Hoff, 2014).

It is important that a manager/leader is a good advocate for you and your organization. Advocacy in all its forms seeks to ensure that people are able to:

• Have their voice heard on issues that are important to them.
• Defend and safeguard their rights.
• Have their views and wishes genuinely considered when decisions are being made about their lives.

Also, advocacy is a process of supporting and enabling people to:

• Express their views and concerns.
• Access information and services.
• Defend and promote their rights and responsibilities.
• Explore choices and options

This allows everyone to be heard, get their onions out, and work together and motivate each other as a team to formulate a plan of action that betters the department/organization (SEAP, 2017).

Authentic leaders are self-actualized who are aware of their strengths, their limitations, and their emotions. They also show their real selves to their colleagues. They do not act one way in private and another in public; they don’t hide their mistakes or weaknesses out of fear of looking weak. This is type of leader I appreciate and hope to be one day. They are real!

I enjoyed that in the video the gentleman describes of involving others and having them have co-ownership of an organization’s mission and have others feel committed and build a strong leading team together.