PSY 435 Week 1 Individual Assignment Industrial Organizational Psychology Paper
Industrial/Organizational Psychology Paper.
Prepare a 700 to 1,050-word paper in which you examine the fundamental concepts of the field of industrial/organizational psychology. In your examination, be sure to address the following items:
Define industrial/organizational psychology.
Describe the evolution of the field of industrial/organizational psychology.
Explain the role of research and statistics in industrial/organizational psychology.
Explain how industrial/organizational psychology is different from other disciplines of psychology.
Include at least three references.
Format your papers consistent with APA guidelines.
Needs help with similar assignment?
We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-12 hours? PAY FOR YOUR FIRST ORDER AFTER COMPLETION..
Read the situation. Then write the hypotheses in correct mathematical notation. Do not conduct any statistical tests. Just write the hypotheses. Insert your answers between the problems.
Here are some things to keep in mind:
1) On the Hypothesis Testing Worksheet, all you need to do is write the null and alternative hypotheses for each situation.
2) The null hypothesis will always be “=”.
3) You can use either “≠” or “not =” for “does not equal”. Greater than and less than is “>” or “” or “<” (one tailed test).
5) When determining what the null and alternative hypotheses are, realize that the alternative is the new information, what you are trying to prove. The null is what has been believed to be true up until now.
==================================================================
1) A bowler who has averaged 196 pins in the past year is asked to experiment with a ball made of a new kind of material. He rolls several games with the new ball. Has the new ball improved his game?
2) An advertisement claims that chewing NoCav gum reduces cavities. To test the claim, you conduct a study in which participants who chew the gum are compared to the national average of 3 cavities found per year.
3) In a speech to the Chamber of Commerce, a city councilman claims that in his city less than 15% of the adult male population are unemployed. An opponent in the upcoming election wants to test the councilman’s claim.
4) The councilman is starting to get worried about the upcoming election. He has enjoyed 63% support for several years, but the political climate has been changing. He wants to know if his support has changed.
5) A production process is considered to be under control if the machine parts it makes have a mean length of 35.50 mm with a standard deviation of 0.45 mm. Whether or not the process is under control is decided each morning by a quality control engineer who bases his decision on a random sample of size 36. Should he ask for an adjustment of the machine on a day when he obtains a mean of 35.62 mm?
6) Jim, the owner of Jim’s Grocery, knows that Plain Chips have always outsold Spicy chips. However, sales of Spicy chips have been increasing. Jim wants to determine if the average weekly sales of Spicy chips have indeed surpassed that of Plain chips.
7) Jim now wants to know if Plain and Spicy chips have the same percentage of defective product (i.e. underfilled bags, torn bags, wrong flavor in the bags, etc.).
8) The Great Vehicle Co. just introduced New SUV, claiming it can pull more weight than Old SUV. After testing 150 vehicles of each model, Old SUV had a mean pull weight of 5032 pounds with a standard deviation of 72 pounds. New SUV had a mean pull weight of 5462 pounds with a standard deviation of 154 pounds. Is the claim valid at a .05 level of significance?
9) The Great Vehicle Co. has a competitor, Amazing Autos, that claims people who purchase its competing vehicle, the Sport Off Road Vehicle (SORV), have higher customer satisfaction than New SUV. Out of 736 people who purchased the SORV last month, 534 said they were satisfied. Out of 521 people who purchased New SUV last month, 375 said they were satisfied. Is there a higher percentage of people who are satisfied with the SORV than with New SUV?
10) The Great Vehicle Company wants to counter Amazing Autos’s claim by making its own claim that New SUV has a lower percentage of defective vehicles. The research team tested 536 vehicles of each model and found that SORV had 53 defective units, while New SUV had only 51 defective units.
Statistics Problems
1) Ask 10 people (try to get 5 males and 5 females) the following questions
A) Their ages
B) How many vitamins they take daily
C) How many carbonated sodas they drink each day
D) How many alcoholic beverages they drink per month
E) Write your own question. Ask your participants if they agree with something or if they do something. For example, you may want to ask them if they eat popcorn when they go to the movies or if they support a political issue. It must be a yes/no question.
SAVE YOUR DATA – You will use the data you gathered above for the problems below and more question in future weeks.
Practice Problems:
1) Use your data from above. This week assume that historically the average person takes 3 vitamins on a daily basis. Conduct a hypothesis test analysis to determine if 3 is still the correct average number. Write your hypotheses in correct statistical notation. Finally use the important numbers from your output to explain your results. Use alpha = 0.05. Post only the relevant numbers, not all of the output; then explain your results.
2) Use your data from above. Analyze if more than 58% support an issue or partake in an activity. (Question E above). Write the hypotheses. Show the relevant numbers. Then explain your results. Use alpha = 0.05.
Needs help with similar assignment?
We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-12 hours? PAY FOR YOUR FIRST ORDER AFTER COMPLETION..
In a two- to three-page paper (excluding the title and reference pages), explain the purpose of an income statement and how it reflects the firm’s financial status. Include important points that an analyst would use in assessing the financial condition of the company. Also, analyze Ford Motor Company’s income statement from its 2012 Annual Report.
Your paper must be formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center, and it must include citations and references for the text and at least two scholarly sources from the Ashford University Library.
Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.
Needs help with similar assignment?
We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-12 hours? PAY FOR YOUR FIRST ORDER AFTER COMPLETION..
Your initial discussion thread is due on Day 3 (Thursday) and you have until Day 7 (Monday) to respond to your classmates. Your grade will reflect both the quality of your initial post and the depth of your responses.
Data Extraction/Comparison
By Day 1 of Week One, your instructor will assign you a State to examine for this discussion. The ability to extract healthcare data from online databases is important to identify trends that can lead to better patient care. The Agency for HealthCare Research and Quality (AHRQ) provides a web based tool for extracting data presented in the National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report. In this discussion you will query the database to find data from your assigned state. Identify the state you were assigned in your discussion post subject line. Go to the AHRQ website mentioned in the required resources section for this week. Click on “State View” and select the state you were assigned. Click on the link that says “Review Underlying Data”. Give two examples of measures for each of the categories below: Achieved the benchmark or better Close to achieving the benchmark Far from achieving the benchmark Include the three benchmarks in your initial post. Investigate one of the measures you noted above that are in the “far from achieving the benchmark” category. Look at the data tables and graphs. What trends do you see over time? How does your state compare to the total group? Be specific and provide the comparison data for all of the measures you noted above in your discussion. For example, “Florida’s breast cancer death rate was 21.50 compared to 23.5 in all populations”. What conclusions can you draw from the data you presented?
Initial Post: Your initial post should be 250 to 300 words. In addition to the textbook, utilize a minimum of two scholarly sources to support your post. Cite and reference your sources in APA format as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Guided Response: Post a minimum of two follow-up responses to your peers by Day 7. Each peer response should be a minimum of five full sentences. Compare and contrast your initial post with your peer’s post. Share an additional perspective or present new information about the discussion topic. Your three required posts must be on three different days of the week.
Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your discussion.
Needs help with similar assignment?
We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-12 hours? PAY FOR YOUR FIRST ORDER AFTER COMPLETION..
Unit 6 Assignment: Hypothesis testing To view your Assignment directions, access the View/Print icon below. Grading rubrics for this Assignment are located under Course Home. Unit outcomes addressed: ● Identify a healthcare problem that can be studied statistically. ● Formulate hypotheses based on a healthcare problem. ● Complete an ANOVA test using SPSS. ● Interpret the SPSS results. ● Summarize the meaning of the results in a brief presentation. Course outcomes: HS312-4: Analyze a mined data set using a computerized statistical package to uncover insight to a healthcare problem. GEL-6.2: Apply a professionally recognized method of formatting and documentation. Instructions As an administrator to a health education program, you suspect that pairing first year students with third-year students will help improve their end-of-year evaluations. To test your hypothesis you develop a mentoring program that has three groups. Group one will be the control. Group two will meet in person weekly. Group three will keep in touch using social media and texting. Analyze the attached data sets of their scores with an ANOVA test using SPSS. Write an executive summary of your study. In the summary, include the ANOVA test results, your hypothesis and its resolution, and the implications of your findings. You must include at least two references (academic sources that must be cited in APA style). Requirements ● This paper should have at least 2 full pages, not including the title page or references. ● This paper must follow APA formatting and citation guidelines, including: ○ Title page and Reference page ○ Essay should be double spaced ○ Use Times New Roman font, size 12 ● Any references should come from credible sources and use APA documentation. ● Includes a highly developed viewpoint ● Organize your paper with subheadings. ● Free of grammar and spelling errors ● No evidence of plagiarism
Needs help with similar assignment?
We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-12 hours? PAY FOR YOUR FIRST ORDER AFTER COMPLETION..
The Age-Graded theory emphasizes the importance of building social capital as a means of decreasing delinquency. As a professional working with adolescents, describe how you would help your clients develop social capital. Which organizations and key individuals would you enlist to assist that development? Be as specific as possible.
Support your answer with evidence from your reading or other primary sources. Integrate at least 1 biblical reference.
300 Word Minimum
Needs help with similar assignment?
We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-12 hours? PAY FOR YOUR FIRST ORDER AFTER COMPLETION..
https://academicwritingsexperts.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/LOGO.png00Samhttps://academicwritingsexperts.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/LOGO.pngSam2023-06-10 05:10:362023-06-10 05:10:36CJUS 310 Developing Social Capital
An explanation of potential challenges in adhering to confidentiality in your field education experience A description of agency policies or mandates with regard to confidentiality An explanation of potential challenges in communicating with clients within your agency
Garthwait, C. L. (2017). The social work practicum: A guide and workbook for students (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Chapter 5, “Communication” (pp. 51-64)
Saxon, C., Jacinto, G. A., & Dziegielewski, S. F. (2006). Self-determination and confidentiality: The ambiguous nature of decision-making in social work practice. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 13(4), 55–72.
Needs help with similar assignment?
We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-12 hours? PAY FOR YOUR FIRST ORDER AFTER COMPLETION..
In the Week Three Assignment, you engaged in a case analysis of a current business problem using some of the components of an argumentative essay. In this written assignment, you will write a complete argumentative essay as described in Sections 9.1 and 9.2 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Foster, Hardy, & Zúñiga y Postigo, 2015). This essay will include a revised and polished version of your Week Three Assignment, an objection to your thesis, a rebuttal, and concluding remarks. In order to benefit the most, you should start working on your Final Project from the time you receive your Week Three Assignment back with comments from your professor.
Your assignment should include the following:
A revision of your Week Three Case Analysis Assignment. Your revision should represent a substantial edit of your work that fully incorporates feedback from your professor and goes well beyond correcting any grammatical or APA errors.
The strongest possible objection to your thesis. After the final paragraph of your Week Three Case Analysis Assignment, start a new paragraph that introduces the strongest possible objection to your thesis. The considerations for this are detailed in Section 9.2 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Hardy, Foster, & Zúñiga y Postigo, 2015). Make sure to employ the appropriate language to introduce the objection, such as “some may object to my thesis as follows” or “according to [so and so] the thesis presented here fails to account for X” [whatever he or she finds problematic]. You can find other language to do this, of course, but the key point here is to make sure that you indicate that someone else is speaking when presenting this objection.
It is also important to remember that you do research to discover good objections and not merely objections that are weak and thus easily rebutted. Look for peer-reviewed journal articles in the Ashford University Library, full-text articles in Google Scholar, or articles in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Present the opposing position fairly and in detail. This may take more than one paragraph.
A rebuttal. This is a refutation of the objection that you have just presented. Start this in a new paragraph following the objection paragraph(s). Once again, follow the indications of Section 9.2 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Hardy, Foster, & Zúñiga y Postigo, 2015). You may point out an error in the objection. Or you may show that, while it is an important objection, it does not apply squarely to your argument, or does not account for facts that make it irrelevant. Above all, make sure to maintain philosophical decorum in your rebuttal. Toward this end, you should apply the principles of charity and of accuracy, first introduced in the Week One course material. See “Confronting Disagreement” in Section 9.4 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Hardy, Foster, & Zúñiga y Postigo, 2015).
Closing remarks. End your argumentative essay with a paragraph of closing remarks. Provide some reflections of what you have attempted to achieve by means of your essay. You could, for example, explain how your essay sheds light on the broader controversy that it addresses. Or you could point out how your essay addresses a frequently ignored point or the unpopular side in the controversy. You could also reflect on the related matters in the broader controversy that would be useful to examine by others. Do not merely summarize what you have done in the body of your essay, and do not add new information here that would support or contradict your essay since the body of your essay should have addressed all the relevant points. See “Closing Your Essay” in Section 9.2 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Hardy, Foster, & Zúñiga y Postigo (2015).
Requirements for your Assignment:
· Your assignment should be between 1500 to 1700 words in length, excluding the cover and references pages.
· Your examination should be both thorough and succinct. This is a combination that demands time and thought, so give yourself sufficient time to draft and revise.
· Your assignment should include citations, as well as a list of references. Both must be in APA form.
· Your references should include at least four peer-reviewed articles in addition to those that you will be carrying over from our Week Three Case Analysis Assignment. These references should be drawn from the Ashford University Library, Google Scholar, or the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
· Your assignment should be submitted no later than the end of Monday (midnight, U.S. Mountain time).
Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.
Needs help with similar assignment?
We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-12 hours? PAY FOR YOUR FIRST ORDER AFTER COMPLETION..
Question 1. 1. According to Caroline Heldman, which of the following is a question that applies to her sexual object test? (Points : 1)
[removed] Does the image show people having sex?
[removed] Does the image show a person as something that can be bought or sold?
[removed] Does the image display a full image of a woman?
[removed] Does the image display violence against people in the image?
Question 2. 2. What would best express Colonel Nicholson’s (Alec Guinness) view regarding what makes a soldier, as expressed in the The Bridge on the River Kwai clip? (Points : 1)
[removed] The virtues of a good soldier are consistent no matter the circumstance.
[removed] A good solider only acts virtuously when it benefits himself and his country.
[removed] The good soldier regards the enemy as having less intrinsic worth than one’s own people.
[removed] All of the above.
Question 3. 3. In 2003, how many people died in Canada, according to the video “Dying for Care: Quality Palliative and End of Life Care in Canada”? (Points : 1)
[removed] 350,000
[removed] 2.2 million
[removed] 750,000
[removed] 226,000
Question 4. 4. What is Tom Regan’s position about the use of animals in research and agriculture? (Points : 1)
[removed] Animals should be used whenever it can be proven that the human benefits outweigh the harms caused to the animals
[removed] Animals should never be used for medical research or commercial agriculture
[removed] Animals should only be used for medical research shown to be beneficial to humanity, never for agriculture
[removed] Animals should be used in both medical research and agriculture but should be treated as humanely as possible
Question 5. 5. According to the video, “Religion, War, and Violence,” for a war to be considered just, it must (Points : 1)
[removed] be aimed at repelling aggression
[removed] have a strong probability of success
[removed] must be only used as a last resort
[removed] all of the above
Question 6. 6. In the Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals we find that to act on ‘duty’ is (Points : 1)
[removed] to act from a self-seeking purpose
[removed] to act because you want to
[removed] to act out of respect for law
[removed] to act out of the fear of God
Question 7. 7. The Ring of Gyges gave the shepherd who found it (Points : 1)
[removed] Intelligence
[removed] Invincibility
[removed] Invisibility
[removed] Wisdom
Question 8. 8. What is Tom Regan’s main criticism of the contractarian approach to ethical duties? (Points : 1)
[removed] It works fine for humans without problems, but it has not yet been applied to animals
[removed] It ignores the importance of pain and suffering when it comes to ethics
[removed] It would allow all kinds of human injustice if a stronger group is able to oppress the members of a weaker group of people
[removed] He does not criticize it; he things that contractarianism, if properly understood, represents the most rational approach to ethical problems
Question 9. 9. Tom Regan’s view of animals is that (Points : 1)
[removed] They are important but not quite as important as human beings
[removed] They have rights, which means that they should never be used for human purposes
[removed] They may be ethically used because they were bred and raised for that purpose
[removed] That they may be eaten because do not have souls like we do and are lower on the food chain
Question 10. 10. Kant explains that respect for a person is: (Points : 1)
[removed] the recognition of the worth of the person’s potential contribution to society.
[removed] dependent upon whether the person respects others.
[removed] both A and B
[removed] none of the above.
Question 11. 11. According to Kant, the moral worth of an action: (Points : 1)
[removed] lies in its conformity to the moral law.
[removed] lies in the value of the expected result.
[removed] lies in its conformity to God’s commands.
[removed] lies in its usefulness to society.
Question 12. 12. According to Robinson, a person who has integrity is someone who: (Points : 1)
[removed] Does what is right, only if it is approved of by others
[removed] Does what is right, even when it is disapproved of by others
[removed] Does what is right, only when commanded to do so
[removed] Does what is right, unless they are commanded to do otherwise
[removed] None of the above
Question 13. 13. Kenneth Anderson argues that the fact that drones make the resort to force easier (Points : 1)
[removed] means that enemies will always be too afraid to attack us
[removed] does not mean that drones make the resort to force too easy
[removed] means that we should instead favor cruise missiles
[removed] all of the above
Question 14. 14. Gilligan claims that females tend to see relationships as these (Points : 1)
[removed] hierarchies
[removed] webs
[removed] rules
[removed] duties
Question 15. 15. The conventional doctrine is endorsed by: (Points : 1)
[removed] Rachels.
[removed] the American Medical Association.
[removed] both a and b.
[removed] neither a nor b.
Question 16. 16. In the video “Drones Are Not Ethical and Effective,” Jeremy Waldron argues that drones are not ethical because their use involves (Points : 1)
[removed] total transparency and accountability
[removed] the assurance that only combatants will be targeted
[removed] the maintenance of a secret death list by government authorities
[removed] all of the above
Question 17. 17. This product was pulled from Abercrombie and Fitch stores based on protests through a blog (Points : 1)
[removed] lingerie
[removed] deep V-neck t-shirts
[removed] padded swimsuit tops for toddlers
[removed] yoga pants
Question 18. 18. Glaukon seems to think that people are (Points : 1)
[removed] Naturally benevolent
[removed] Naturally pious
[removed] Naturally just
[removed] Naturally egocentric
Question 19. 19. According to John Stuart Mill, utilitarianism takes into account the happiness of: (Points : 1)
[removed] only the agent.
[removed] only the agent and those the agent cares about.
[removed] everyone, but weights the happiness of the agent more heavily.
[removed] everyone, and weights everyone’s happiness equally.
Question 20. 20. Kant argues that when I find someone in need: (Points : 1)
[removed] I should give whatever spare resources I have unless it makes me worse off than the person I’m trying to help.
[removed] I should consider a world in which no one helped me when I was in need, recognize that I could never will such a world, and help them in the best way that I can.
[removed] I should sympathize with them, but recognize that the world is better off overall if we each only look after our own interests.
[removed] I should remember that as autonomous beings they are responsible for their own situation, and thus that I have no responsibility to help them out.
Question 21. 21. Which of the following would be an expression of rule utilitarianism, rather than act utilitarianism? (Points : 1)
[removed] “It’s okay to torture this person because it may save thousands of lives.”
[removed] “It’s immoral to torture this person because the pain it would cause him outweighs any potential benefits.”
[removed] “Even if torturing this person right now might be beneficial, the overall consequences of permitting torture would be harmful, and so we shouldn’t allow it in any circumstance.”
[removed] “We shouldn’t torture this person because we wouldn’t want him torturing us.”
Question 22. 22. Robinson describes magnanimity as the mean between the extremes of: (Points : 1)
[removed] Vanity and vice
[removed] Generosity and selfishness
[removed] Generosity and greed
[removed] Vanity and pusillanimity
[removed] None of the above
Question 23. 23. What moral theory does Jeremy Bentham (with whom Singer seems to agree) endorse? (Points : 1)
[removed] Moral relativism
[removed] Anarchism
[removed] Utilitarianism
[removed] Social Contract Theory
Question 24. 24. In the article “War and Massacre,” Thomas Nagel argues that moral absolutism (Points : 1)
[removed] is consistent with the principles of utilitarianism
[removed] can be used to justify genocide
[removed] is primarily concerned with what a person is doing
[removed] is primarily concerned with the outcome of a person’s actions
Question 25. 25. Midgley analyzes the position that each society is a separate culture with its own values. This position is known as (Points : 1)
[removed] Moral relativism
[removed] Moral isolationism
[removed] Moral structuralism
[removed] Moral voluntarism
Question 26. 26. Rachels claims that most actual cases of killing: (Points : 1)
[removed] are morally worse than most actual cases of letting die.
[removed] are morally the same most actual cases of letting die.
[removed] are morally less bad than most actual cases of letting die.
[removed] are morally required.
Question 27. 27. According to Leon Kass, the drive to legalize euthanasia can be largely attributed to (Points : 1)
[removed] the rise in a largely technical approach to healing.
[removed] an increase in our sympathy.
[removed] an increased respect for human dignity.
[removed] the secularization of modern society.
Question 28. 28. Nagel argues that the atomic bomb attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were just like what other kind of action, just on a larger scale? (Points : 1)
[removed] Killing the wife and child of someone attacking you in order to distract him from his attack.
[removed] Bombing a munitions factory and killing some of the civilian workers inside.
[removed] Firing at an enemy soldier and hitting an innocent bystander with a stray bullet.
[removed] Bombing a convoy of enemy soldiers.
Question 29. 29. Rachels claims that active euthanasia: (Points : 1)
[removed] sometimes leads to more suffering than passive euthanasia.
[removed] sometimes leads to the same amount of suffering as passive euthanasia.
[removed] sometimes leads to less suffering than passive euthanasia.
[removed] all of the above.
Question 30. 30. Robinson agrees with Aquinas’ idea that (Points : 1)
[removed] Honor is a subjective quality
[removed] Honor is secondary to integrity
[removed] Honor must be displayed in action
[removed] Honor is secondary to magnanimity
[removed] None of the above
Question 31. 31. Rachels claims that once it has been decided that euthanasia is desirable in a case: (Points : 1)
[removed] a moral error has already been made.
[removed] it has been decided that death is no greater an evil than the patient’s continued existence.
[removed] it has been decided that the patient does not have a right to life.
[removed] the amount of suffering of the patient becomes irrelevant.
Question 32. 32. Aristotle regards passions and feelings like anger as: (Points : 1)
[removed] a sign that one lacks rational control over one’s state of mind.
[removed] always either an excess or a defect in one’s character.
[removed] capable of excess, defect, or the intermediate state characteristic of virtue.
[removed] Both (a) and (b).
Question 33. 33. Michael Walzer argues that in the unique world of war, both morality and authority are (Points : 1)
[removed] radically contested
[removed] established by rules of war
[removed] established by neutral states
[removed] none of the above
Question 34. 34. James Rachels points out that when passive euthanasia is employed on infants, they typically die of: (Points : 1)
[removed] poisoning.
[removed] SARS.
[removed] suffocation.
[removed] dehydration and infection.
Question 35. 35. According to Colin Stokes, in this film all the heroic, wise, and villainous characters are female. (Points : 1)
[removed] The Little Mermaid
[removed] Star Wars
[removed] The Wizard of Oz
[removed] Les Miserables
Question 36. 36. This is the name for prostitutes in India who have been dedicated to a female goddess (Points : 1)
[removed] Hindus
[removed] Hiermala
[removed] Devadasi
[removed] Sangli
Question 37. 37. Kant claims that the moral law is given to each person by: (Points : 1)
[removed] God’s commands.
[removed] one’s own rational will.
[removed] one’s natural desires.
[removed] social conditioning.
Question 38. 38. What does Tom Regan say about the cruelty/kindness approach to animal ethics? (Points : 1)
[removed] The best way to explain animal ethics is in terms of our obligation to be kind and not cruel to animals
[removed] It is inadequate because it is possible to do wrong while being kind, and it is possible to do wrong without being deliberately cruel
[removed] It has no relevance to animal ethics because animals are cruel to each other
[removed] You have to be cruel to be kind, in the right measure
Question 39. 39. Hill claims that a fruitful way to think about the badness of destroying the environment is: (Points : 1)
[removed] To think about what kind of human would choose to destroy the earth.
[removed] To appeal to theories about God and care for the earth.
[removed] To examine people’s intuitions about whether it is right to harm the environment.
[removed] To examine the rights that belong to the environment and act on the basis of those rights.
Question 40. 40. Midgley thinks that although we can understand or appreciate other societies, (Points : 1)
[removed] We should never judge the values of other societies.
[removed] We must always respect the values of other societies.
[removed] We have the right to judge other societies.
[removed] We cannot understand them well enough to judge them.
Question 41. 41. Aristotle claims that the function of human life is: (Points : 1)
[removed] survival and reproduction.
[removed] service to the gods.
[removed] rational activity.
[removed] to pursue pleasure.
Question 42. 42. Which of the following does Peter Singer assert about the principle of equality? (Points : 1)
[removed] People should have equal rights because they are factually equal.
[removed] People with higher abilities, it stands to reason, should have greater rights.
[removed] Different groups of humans should have equal rights if scientific investigation proves that there are no genetic differences in their abilities.
[removed] It is a prescription that we should treat people equally regardless of their differing abilities.
Question 43. 43. What is speciesism? (Points : 1)
[removed] The view that all animals should be treated equally regardless of their abilities
[removed] The view that endangered species have the right to exist
[removed] Allowing the interests of one’s own species to override the greater interests of members of other species
[removed] Protecting endangered species from extinction regardless of economic costs
Question 44. 44. According to the scene from The Bridge on the River Kwai, what is the ultimate reason Colonel Nicholson (Alec Guinness) insists that the soldiers work hard to build the best bridge possible: (Points : 1)
[removed] Because even in captivity, they know that God is watching them.
[removed] So that the British forces will be able to fight the Japanese more effectively.
[removed] Because the better the bridge, the more benefit they will receive and less punishment they will endure from their captors.
[removed] Because it is an expression of the strength and dignity of a soldier even in captivity.
Question 45. 45. A false promise, according to Kant, is: (Points : 1)
[removed] something that I could never will to be universal law.
[removed] something that I could will to be universal law only when it benefits the majority.
[removed] something that I could will to be universal law only when it benefits me.
[removed] something that I could will to be universal law only when it prevents a greater wrong.
Question 46. 46. Tom Regan discusses the concept of indirect duties. Having only indirect duties towards animals means (Points : 1)
[removed] That we have a duty not to harm animals but only because of the harm it might do to humans
[removed] That we have no duties regarding animals whatsoever
[removed] That our duties towards animals are equal to our duties towards humans
[removed] That we actually have greater duties to animals than to humans
Question 47. 47. Glaukon thinks that deep in our hearts we all believe that (Points : 1)
[removed] Injustice is more profitable than justice.
[removed] We will have a clearer conscience if we always stick to the laws of justice.
[removed] To be unjust is to be a fool.
[removed] Both B and C.
Question 48. 48. How have historians tended to treat typically male tendencies versus typically female tendencies? (Points : 1)
[removed] Historians value female tendencies more highly because it is childbearing and childrearing that enable the group to survive
[removed] Female traditions have been emphasized because they reflect keep aesthetic refinement and sophistication
[removed] Male tendencies, like mathematics, warfare, and even singing have been prized more highly
[removed] No correlation has been found at all between criminal violence and childhood abuse
Question 49. 49. What, according to Noddings, do male philosophers tend to say about death (as opposed to women)? (Points : 1)
[removed] Men are more brave in the face of death than women because of their natural courageousness
[removed] Death tends to be harder on men due to their attachments to the glory of this world
[removed] Women are more able to allow their faith in the afterlife overcome their aversion to death
[removed] Male philosophers often talk as though the world or reason and abstraction is superior to the physical world of the body
Get Answer Over WhatsApp
Order Paper Now
