I need someone who learned this course to help me complete this paper, Thanks! If you don’t know the model, please don’t bid this task!

Format

I. The Organizational Context

a. Using the PESTLE model, what is the context in which the organization finds itself?

b. What are the internal issues the organization is dealing with?

c. NOTE: Select the diagnostic model you will use (e.g., McKinsey 7-S, Weisbord Six-Box, or any other approved by me) and using the model, explain the internal issues as they would fit the model. For example, one of the “Ss” for the McKinsey 7-S model is “structure.” If the internal issue is that the wrong organizational structure exists due to a change in organizational strategy, then note it that way.

II. The Management Problem (Use the diagnostic model you selected)

Think of this like a doctor diagnosing illness. Or think of it as a Gap Analysis.

a. What symptoms do you observe that suggest something is wrong (e.g., too many errors on forms, turnover is too high, etc.) versus what you should be seeing.

b. What could be causing each symptom. Identify the causes (and why they are the causes). Find research that suggests what can cause the symptoms, what happens if not addressed (e.g., Turnover can come from low job satisfaction, and turnover costs an organization $X a year). This can be from academic journals, and can also come from periodicals such as trade publications,BusinessWeek(or similar periodicals), newspapers (especiallyThe Wall Street Journal). The lit review focuses on the management question/problem and provides a framework for why solutions are important to resolve it, and why ignoring it is not an option.

c. What needs to change (*note—there may be many issues, but focus on the ones you are most familiar with, or view as most important). By this, given the symptoms, given the causes, what exactly would you change to “fix” the causes (not the symptoms—the causes).

  i. These are your alternative recommendations. One option is always to do nothing—to leave things as they are. As you develop alternative recommendations, one certain ones will be feasible to do (maybe they are affordable, maybe they are necessary because time is short and they are easier to implement and provide a quicker solution—or maybe because they have the highest long term payoff). As the change leader you need to develop recommendations or solutions. Again, these are the “fixes” for your problem causes. The selected recommendation/solutions will be what you implement.

III. The Change Initiative (Use the Kotter 8-Step model; however, you can select another implementation model with my approval. As you work through the implementation, use the Armenakis-Harris-Feild model to show what the change leader (you) would do to create readiness for the change (see item III-v below).

a. What is the plan for implementing the change(s) you believe is/are needed? What exactly are you going to implement? Be specific. Provide a step-by-step plan.  Specifically note:

  i. What will your change be (drawn from the developed recommendations/solutions)?

  ii. What major challenges will you/the organization face in implementing the proposed changes?

  iii. Who are the stakeholders in this case who can have an impact, for good or ill on the change initiative? What influence can they wield?

  iv. What types of resistance are you/the organization likely to encounter? How will you address each type of resistance?

  v. Use the Armenakis, Harris, Feild Institutionalizing Change Model. NOTE: Remember, this model is designed to look at change from the change recipient’s perspective. Thus:

1. Consider the five elements of readiness (discrepancy, appropriateness, principal support, efficacy, and valence). This means you are explaining to the organizational members why the change is needed, why the proposed change is appropriate (and, of course, what it is), who is supporting the change (and if none initially, you need to build a coalition—thus, one of the changes may be to get a guiding coalition together), the support the organization will provide the members (this is the efficacy element), and what the “pay-off” will be for both the organization and the members (long term and short term—and note—if it involves pay cuts or downsizing there may be pain for some and no positive pay-off).

b. A literature review of why this change initiative is the best alternative (here is where many, if not all of your references may show up).

IV. Evaluation

a. What are the specific outcomes you seek? For example, a reduction in Turnover (The outcomes actually will be that the symptoms you recorded cease to be. Don’t include outcomes like “a ‘motivated’ workforce’ or ‘better community relations.’ If you can’t quantify it, don’t say it.

b. What will you do to evaluate the results of the implementation? For example, use of surveys, quality control measures, recorded cost savings, etc.

V. Conclusions

a. Final thoughts, etc.

VI. Reference page:

a. NOTE: You are required to use a minimum offive peer-reviewed journalarticles/papers in support of your analysis and plan development. Beyond that you can draw from any source (except WIKIPEDIA) to support your analysis and plan.

b. NOTE: You should be using outside sources to bolster your case for change, support for the type of change, etc. so you should (a) be citing these sources within the body of the change analysis and plan and (b) including a reference page at the end. NOTE: Both citations and references should be done using APA guidelines. Just a hint–don’t list the reference page with a “VI” or whatever. It should be on a separate page. Center the word “References” and then include your references below that. See the following resources for APA style guidelines:

  i. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association(6th ed.).  (2009). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

  ii. OWL Purdue Writing Center, click on APA Guide athttps://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/section/2/10/

Required Readings:

• Text of the 14th Amendment i have uploaded this file.
• Schuessler, Jennifer. “The History Behind the Birthright Citizenship Battle” (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
• Barbash, Fred. “Trump Meet Wong Kim Ark, the Chinese American Cook Who Is the Father of Birthright Citizenship” (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
• Rodriguez, Cristina. “The Citizenship Clause, Original Meaning, and the Egalitarian Unity of the Fourteenth Amendment”

________

The minimum word count for the writing is 1,500. Failure to meet the word count will result in grade penalties. Utilize our readings to make your points, but you should also conduct research into outside sources (as well as any past readings that you feel are relevant) to support your points. You have flexibility in how you want to apply those articles. Use your own judgement, but it should be sufficient. (TIP: Using only one article = not sufficient)

PROMPT: Regarding citizenship by place of birth (i.e., jus soli), Rodriguez writes that:

“[Citizenship by place of birth] is not… perfectly egalitarian because it rests on an arbitrary distriction between persons born on opposite sides of a border. The rule is clearly under-inclusive because many persons not born in the United States are de facto members of our society and yet are not automatically entitled to citizenship. And, it is also over-inclusive in that it makes citizens many people who who will form no relationship to the United States — a limitation that we accept largely because we understand the rule to be a prophylactic one, or one designed to prevent castes from arising. But that the anti-inheritance principle does not produce globally egalitarian results should not reduce our commitment to reading the Fourteenth Amendment, as it governs the United States as a polity, as inclusively as possible, and thus without regard to parentage.”

In the case of Wong Kim Ark, his parents were excluded from naturalization, but he himself was ultimately allowed citizenship. Today, a child born in the United States receives birthright citizenship, yet their parents are still excluded from naturalization if they are undocumented. Based on your readings and research, does the idea of birthright citizenship require revisiting? Furthermore, what should be the role of Asian American communities in addressing these issues, when most of the discussion is centered on migration from Latin American countries? Does birthright citizenship and continuing debates around immigration still have relevance for Asian Americans today? Why or why not?

The majority of your work must be research and material specifically written for this paper.

Establish a clear position and integrate concrete examples from readings as well as other outside sources. Include proper citations and works cited page in an MLA/APA format. The paper must be consistently formatted.

_____

the point that will be focus in grading :

rough Draft of Final Paper

In this course, we look at classical ethical theories of utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics. We also examine different perspectives on ethical issues introduced by relativism, ethical egoism, and emotivism. For this paper, you will apply these theories and perspectives to a current issue, selected from the list of issues below.

Choose one of the ethical issues from the list to research and write about. It is recommended that you choose a topic that you are familiar with or that you have thought about previously, if possible. For example, you might choose an issue that either worries you or enrages you, you might choose one that you have worked on, or you might choose one that relates to recent events in your community.

Possible Issues

• Corporate executive compensation
• Corporate contributions to political campaigns
• Affirmative action
• The media and its responsibilities
• Domestic surveillance
• Whistle blowing in government or in a business
• Religion in the workplace
• Pornography
• Consumer tracking
• Ethical problems of gambling
• Progressive taxation rates
• Immigration
• Women’s equality

In your paper, you will apply the ethical theories and perspectives to the issue that you select. You do not have to use all six, but you should apply at least two ethical theories and at least one ethical perspective in your paper. Make sure that you write primarily on ethical topics and concepts; do not get distracted by doing analyses that apply political, economic, religious, or legal perspectives. Describe, compare, and apply the ethical theories and perspectives to the topics. Explain how the theories and perspectives would analyze the issue. What are the ethical issues? Where are there breaches of ethical behavior? How could each theory help us think about what would constitute virtuous or ethical behavior?

Your draft must include at least three pages of text, plus a title page and a reference page. Your draft should include a clear thesis statement that states what you plan to argue. Also, include a list of the resources you intend to use. Format your rough draft according to APA (6th edition) style and properly cite and reference all your resources, using APA format. If you would like to refer to APA samples and tutorials, visit the Ashford Writing Center, within the Learning Resources tab in the left navigation bar