MLA Citations

Use MLA style to create works cited page which includes any

  • 1 book,
  • 1 chapter (or section) from a book of collected works with an editor,
  • 2 articles in a print scholarly journal,
  • 2 newspaper articles,
  • 2 articles in an online journal,
  • 2 web pages including the URL,
  • 2 chart/map/table or other pictorial information,
  • 1 television or radio program,
  • 1 personal interview, and
  • 1 government publication.

You should have a total of 15 citations on your works cited page. You do not have to read any of these sources, just find them and glean all the information necessary to create the citation according to MLA style. Use a word program to correctly format the works cited page including proper spacing and hanging indents.

Answer the following questions:

1. What information appears in an in-text citation (also called “parenthetical citation” or “interlinear” citation”)?

2. When is an in-text citation needed and where does it appear?

3. How are multiple sources by the same author ordered in a works cited page?

4. Where does the publication date appear in a citation?

5. How is a work by multiple authors cited?

6. Define plagiarism.

7. List 3 ways to use research while avoiding plagiarism.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-12 hours? PAY FOR YOUR FIRST ORDER AFTER COMPLETION..

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Do you have an upcoming essay or assignment due?

Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

If yes Order Paper Now

4 forum responses

each of these responses should be at least 150 words.

Unlike the Toulmin and Rogerian methods where one side is argued over another, the Middle Ground argument mediates between two sides of an issue hopefully arriving at a compromise solution between two positions.

In your responses to your classmates on their concluding remarks, feel free to compare your approach to your classmates. You may also help students find additional ways to use argumentation/persuasion in their chosen educational/career field.

Cite work please

Respond to them as if you were talking to them please.

Response 1. Steven

A previous topic I wrote about was smoking, and the effects of second hand smoke to health. My claim was to ban smoking from public places due to the health effects to the unwilling people. A middle ground might be, make it illegal in public areas such as parks or playgrounds and make it legal in a certain amount of buildings or private business’. Make sure the private business has a sign out front saying it’s a smoking area. That way no one in the public will be exposed and if you don’t want to be exposed you do not have to go to the smoking premises. My claim would have had to been slightly adjusted from making it completely illegal to legal in some areas and illegal in others.
I think I would have approached it similarly, in regards to stats of health effects. I could bring in topics such as strip clubs, it is illegal to be nude in public but legal in a private business, and there are signs out front to be sure you know what the institution is. I’m not sure if I would have needed additional sources to adjust my claim to the middle ground. I think I could get away with similar or even the same sources.

Response 2. Nick

“Although some believe humans are not the cause of global warming, scientist have asserted that people are accelerating global warming at a rapid pace due to their use of consumer products, fossil fuel, and industrial emissions.” This was the claim that I used for the essay to layout a detailed plan for what I would talk about through the rest of my essay. I then used the rest of the essay to prove my claim by giving facts, statistics, and quotes from peer-reviewed sources. I used the standard Toulmin format that we learned in the lessons for that week and filled in the information in order of the three causes of global warming that were in my claim.

If I were to write this claim as a Middle Ground argument I would have had to adjust my claim to be unbiased and more neutral. The rest of the paper I would have been more neutral and presented just facts as opposed to arguing for my position. I would have had to find at least two more sources for the counter argument side to balance out the opposing views. I think the Middle Ground solution would not necessarily be more practical based on the lack of true evidence for both sides of the argument. I think that the Toulmin method is the most effective method for this topic.

My take away from this course is the structure of writing an effective arguement. I now have a more organized process for writing an essay in multiple styles. I will use this in my coming courses that require writing in a persuasive form.

Response 3. Cory

For the topic of this forum post I chose to use the topic in my Toulmin Essay which was that Hybrid Cars are a great green alternative to traditional gas powered vehicles when they are maintained regularly and safely by certified professionals and once they have run the course of their life properly disposed of. In that essay I was taking a stronger stance towards advocating for Hybrid vehicles but for a middle ground discussion I would make a point to address pros and cons of both types of vehicles and advise on proper maintenance schedules and upkeep to prolong the life of the vehicles and make minor upgrades to gas vehicles to help their emissions and miles per gallon. I’m sure making this claim would require some more research and sources to cite. I feel this approach would be more practical because some people simply don’t want to own a hybrid car.

Closing remarks for the class and my future with AMU. English courses have always been courses I have done okay in. Not exceptionally well, but not failing outright either. Given my chosen career field could require alot of writing and verbal communication skills I am going to take what I have learned and work to build upon and improve the skills I have learned in this class.

Response 4. Brandon

Middle Ground:

For this I will be selecting my piece I wrote on standardized testing. When I wrote this piece I argued it from a Toulmin Method, basically arguing that standardize testing was an antiquated form of benchmarking progress. In my argument, I presented how much time it takes away from instructors and from students and how ineffective it is in properly measuring them according to skill. In many ways, these test marginalized class bodies, resulting in poorer performance. If I was to re-write this as a middle ground, I would need to find more information on new methods of testing and how effective they are. I would also need to find further information supporting why testing is needed for plan development, although I did cover this briefly in my paper. I believe that in many ways a middle ground approach would benefit my argument, however, I still feel that it wouldn’t be as effective as my previous.

Concluding Remarks:

Reflecting back on the progress I’ve made through this course one thing is apparent to me: properly forming an argument is crucial to remove as much bias as possible. Without credibility, it is simply hot air lacking any real direction. In my career, this is a common issue with leadership. Often we get passionate about an idea and insert ourselves into an issue without clearly researching why something may or may not be the best course of action. This course has taught me to look at the way I structure my arguments and really look at it in terms of effectiveness and communication. Does it really get my claim across? Is my claim valid? Have I inadvertently alienated someone who could be my biggest proverbial cheerleader?

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-12 hours? PAY FOR YOUR FIRST ORDER AFTER COMPLETION..

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Do you have an upcoming essay or assignment due?

Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

If yes Order Paper Now

purity.impurity of crystallization

A 3.5 g aspirin sample is 75% pure. The sample is recrystallized in water/ethanol mixture that has a solubility of 20.0 g/100 mL in hot solvent and 5.6 g/ 100 mL in ice cold solvent. Assume the main impurity has the solubility of 20.0 g/ 100 mL in hot solvent and 15.0 g/ 100 mL in ice cold solvent. Assume that the main impurity is the only impurity.

  1. What is the minimum amount of hot solvent need to dissolve all of the aspirin and the main impurity in hot solvent. Explain how you find the correct answer.
  2. What mass of aspirin is recovered. Explain how you find the correct answer.
  3. What is the % purity of the recrystallized aspirin? Explain how you find the correct answer.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-12 hours? PAY FOR YOUR FIRST ORDER AFTER COMPLETION..

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Do you have an upcoming essay or assignment due?

Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

If yes Order Paper Now

Agriculture laws and regulations

Use this dropbox to submit your proposed TOPIC SELECTION for your Ag Laws Term Paper. Include your name, ABT-58 and the date, single-spaced, in the upper right corner. Type a DESCRIPTIVE TITLE that clearly indicates the topic and focus of your paper. Format the title so it is BOLD and CENTERED. Write one or two paragraphs explaining the topic you have selected.

At the top of page 2, create a WORKS CITED page with WORKS CITED in all caps and centered. Include AT LEAST THREE REFERENCES in MLA FORMAT.

Be sure to choose a topic that is VERY SPECIFIC. I am not looking for a general description or summary of a broad law or regulation, but a deep look into a specific detail, case or other interesting topic. Consider choosing a specific piece of a law, compliance with a particular aspect of a law, or an interesting court case that resulted from a specific law. Look through the modules and content of this course for ideas.

I RECOMMEND THAT YOU FIND YOUR THREE REFERENCES FIRST, before you begin to complete this homework assignment. This way you will be certain that the information you need for the term paper is available, and the topic is sufficiently focused.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-12 hours? PAY FOR YOUR FIRST ORDER AFTER COMPLETION..

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Do you have an upcoming essay or assignment due?

Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

If yes Order Paper Now

Public Administration Unit4 DB

Make a Key Assignment outline for the paper that was written below:

You have been appointed to be a part of a special committee that is responsible for devising policy procedures and a budget for the organization’s earthquake preparedness. The last earthquake in 2003 exposed areas of weakness within the organization, regarding the need for emergency equipment and supplies. You and your committee will need to draft a proposal that will address what earthquake emergency equipment and supplies will be required, as well as a budget that will show how much the items and overall expenses will cost to maintain and replace expired items.

The budget needs to include how many staff members will be needed to operate the emergency preparedness department. You should begin your proposal by identifying the population size being served by your public administration organization and by identifying any other factors about the population being served that are relevant to your overall proposal. Examples of other factors could be matters related to geography, the needs of a particular subpopulation, or regional weather patterns.

Secondly, the committee will need to propose an earthquake policy to address the proper protocols if and when an earthquake should occur. The policy needs to stipulate what emergency procedures need to be followed. The policy should include the frequency of earthquake drills by all personnel and who is responsible for stocking the earthquake supplies and maintaining the emergency preparedness budget.

Finally, the committee needs to include a rationale in the proposal for what challenges the organization may face in implementing and maintaining the operations of the emergency earthquake preparedness.

Assignment Guidelines

  • Address the following in your proposal of 1,000–1,250 words:
    • The Budget
      • Must include a breakdown of the various emergency supplies to be used in the event of an earthquake
      • Needs to include how many staff members will be needed to operate the emergency preparedness department
      • You should begin your proposal by identifying the population size being served by your public administration organization.
      • Identify any other factors about the population being served that are relevant to your overall proposal
      • Other factors may include the following:
        • Matters related to geography
        • Needs of a particular subpopulation
        • Regional weather patterns
    • Earthquake Policy
      • This policy needs to stipulate what emergency procedures need to be followed.
      • This policy should include the following:
        • The frequency of earthquake drills by all personnel
        • Responsibilities for stocking the earthquake supplies
        • A plan for maintaining the emergency preparedness budget
    • Identifying Challenges
      • What challenges might the organization face in implementing and maintaining the operations of the emergency earthquake preparedness? Explain in detail.
  • Remember to support all of your arguments with scholarly resources.
  • Be sure to reference all sources using APA style.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-12 hours? PAY FOR YOUR FIRST ORDER AFTER COMPLETION..

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Do you have an upcoming essay or assignment due?

Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

If yes Order Paper Now

Ford’s Pinto Fires Case Responding questions essay

Read the case “Ford’s Pinto Fires: The Retrospective View of Ford’s Field Recall Coordinator”

While this case dates back a number of years it remains prominent in the study of business ethics.

The case is found on pp.91-96 of the Weiss text and has questions for analysis on page 96.

Grading Criteria – Unit 2 Ford’s Pinto Fires Case Study

Points

Responds
fully to each question using material from the case study to support
the responses. No more than 15% of the submission is direct quote.
Student relies on summary and paraphrase to demonstrate understanding of
material.

0-50

Contains no grammatical or typographical errors

0-25

Submission is no fewer than 500 words INCLUSIVE of questions and references

0-15

Includes APA-formatted in-text citations and References page. REQUIRED.

0-10

TOTAL

0-100

Questions for Discussion
1. The Ford Pinto met federal safety standards, yet it had a design fl
aw that
resulted in serious injuries and deaths. Is simply meeting safety standards a
sufficient product design goal of ethical companies?
2. Gioia uses the notion of script schemas to help explain why he voted to
not initiate a recall of the Ford Pinto. In your opinion, is this
a justifiable
explanation?
3. How can organizational context influence the decisions made by organizational members?
4. If you had been in Gioia’s position, what would you have done? Why?
5. Describe the four key decision-making lessons that Gioia identifies for
neophyte decision makers. Discuss how you expect or intend to use these
four lessons in your own career.

Weiss, J. W. (2014). Business Ethics : A Stakeholder and Issues Management Approach. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-12 hours? PAY FOR YOUR FIRST ORDER AFTER COMPLETION..

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Do you have an upcoming essay or assignment due?

Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

If yes Order Paper Now

Need psychology help with the recent emphasis on improving American students’ mathematics abilities

With the recent emphasis on improving American students’ mathematics
abilities, many textbooks have been created each purporting that its
instructional approach will most significantly advance the skills of
learners. In this assignment, you will review mathematics textbooks and
their instructional approaches.

1) Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

  a) Review the resource document “Publisher Contact Information.”
This will provide you with links to the websites of several publishers
where you can research currently available math textbooks.

  b) This assignment uses a grading rubric.

  c) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found
in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An
abstract is not required.

2) Select three currently available mathematics textbooks to review.
All three should be intended for use at the same grade level.

3) In a paper of 1,250-1,500 words, evaluate the textbooks and the
related approaches to teaching mathematics. Include a full APA-format
citation and grade-level information for each textbook evaluated. Your
evaluation should provide the following:

  a) A description of the strengths and weaknesses of each textbook.

  b) A critique of the instructional approach of each textbook.

  c) A rationale for selecting one of these textbooks over the others.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-12 hours? PAY FOR YOUR FIRST ORDER AFTER COMPLETION..

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Do you have an upcoming essay or assignment due?

Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

If yes Order Paper Now

250-350 Words- APA Style Format

To Prepare for This Discussion:

Conduct an online search to find a legal case, journal article, or detailed news article that describes a recent criminal case involving the kind of health care facility in which you are interested in working. The case you select may involve fraud or abuse (such as defrauding the Medicare or Medicaid programs, the Stark self-referral law, anti-kickback statute, or price-fixing) or other criminal act, such as patient abuse, murder, or theft. Evaluate the laws that are involved in your case, and consider the ramifications of this criminal action on the individuals and organizations involved.

A good source for cases is the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit. Consider looking through one or two state websites, which can be accessed at: http://www.namfcu.net/states.

As you analyze your case and prepare for the Discussion, consider possible motivations behind this criminal act. What could an administrator do to prevent this from happening or to address it effectively once it is detected? Would a compliance program (see “Compliance 101” in this week’s Learning Resources) be of value in preventing or detecting and then correcting this criminal issue?https://oig.hhs.gov/compliance/compliance-resource…

Briefly describe the case you selected. Evaluate the state and/or federal laws that are involved in your case. (If you are an international student, evaluate the regional laws that are involved in your case.) Then explain the ramifications of this criminal action for the individuals and organizations involved (for example, states work with the federal government in capturing fraud).

Discussion Posting Content

Points:

Points Range: 22 (55%) – 24 (60%)

Discussion posting demonstrates an excellent understanding of all of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Posting provides significant detail (including multiple relevant examples); evidence from the readings and other scholarly sources; and discerning ideas.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 19 (47.5%) – 21 (52.5%)

Discussion posting demonstrates a good understanding of most of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Posting provides moderate detail (including at least one pertinent example); evidence from the readings and other scholarly sources; and discerning ideas.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 17 (42.5%) – 18 (45%)

Discussion posting demonstrates a fair understanding of the concepts and key points as presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Posting may be lacking or incorrect in some area, or in detail and specificity, and/or may not include sufficient pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 16 (40%)

Discussion posting demonstrates poor or no understanding of the concepts and key points of the text/s and Learning Resources. Posting is incorrect and/or shallow and/or does not include any pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings.

Feedback:

Peer Feedback and Interaction

Points:

Points Range: 8 (20%) – 8 (20%)

The feedback postings and responses to questions are excellent and fully contribute to the quality of interaction by offering constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 7 (17.5%) – 7 (17.5%)

The feedback postings and responses to questions are good but may not fully contribute to the quality of interaction by offering constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 6 (15%) – 6 (15%)

The feedback postings and responses to questions only partially contribute to the quality of interaction by offering insufficient constructive critique or suggestions, shallow questions, or providing poor quality additional resources.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 5 (12.5%)

Student does not interact with peers (0 points) or the feedback postings and responses to questions do not contribute to the quality of interaction by offering any constructive critique, suggestions, questions, or additional resources.

Feedback:

Writing

Points:

Points Range: 8 (20%) – 8 (20%)

Postings are well organized, use scholarly tone, contain original writing and proper paraphrasing, follow APA style, contain very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and are fully consistent with graduate-level writing style.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 7 (17.5%) – 7 (17.5%)

Postings are mostly consistent with graduate-level writing style. Postings may have some small organization, scholarly tone, writing, or APA style issues, and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 6 (15%) – 6 (15%)

Postings are somewhat below graduate-level writing style. Postings may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and/or contain many writing and/or spelling errors, or show moderate reliance on quoting vs. original writing and paraphrasing.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 5 (12.5%)

Postings are well below graduate-level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or show heavy reliance on quoting.

Feedback:

Discussion Posting Content

Levels of Achievement:

22 (55%) – 24 (60%)

Discussion posting demonstrates an excellent understanding of all of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Posting provides significant detail (including multiple relevant examples); evidence from the readings and other scholarly sources; and discerning ideas.

19 (47.5%) – 21 (52.5%)

Discussion posting demonstrates a good understanding of most of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Posting provides moderate detail (including at least one pertinent example); evidence from the readings and other scholarly sources; and discerning ideas.

17 (42.5%) – 18 (45%)

Discussion posting demonstrates a fair understanding of the concepts and key points as presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Posting may be lacking or incorrect in some area, or in detail and specificity, and/or may not include sufficient pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings.

0 (0%) – 16 (40%)

Discussion posting demonstrates poor or no understanding of the concepts and key points of the text/s and Learning Resources. Posting is incorrect and/or shallow and/or does not include any pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings.

Feedback:

Peer Feedback and Interaction

Levels of Achievement:

8 (20%) – 8 (20%)

The feedback postings and responses to questions are excellent and fully contribute to the quality of interaction by offering constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes.

7 (17.5%) – 7 (17.5%)

The feedback postings and responses to questions are good but may not fully contribute to the quality of interaction by offering constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes.

6 (15%) – 6 (15%)

The feedback postings and responses to questions only partially contribute to the quality of interaction by offering insufficient constructive critique or suggestions, shallow questions, or providing poor quality additional resources.

0 (0%) – 5 (12.5%)

Student does not interact with peers (0 points) or the feedback postings and responses to questions do not contribute to the quality of interaction by offering any constructive critique, suggestions, questions, or additional resources.

Feedback:

Writing

Levels of Achievement:

8 (20%) – 8 (20%)

Postings are well organized, use scholarly tone, contain original writing and proper paraphrasing, follow APA style, contain very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and are fully consistent with graduate-level writing style.

7 (17.5%) – 7 (17.5%)

Postings are mostly consistent with graduate-level writing style. Postings may have some small organization, scholarly tone, writing, or APA style issues, and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors.

6 (15%) – 6 (15%)

Postings are somewhat below graduate-level writing style. Postings may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and/or contain many writing and/or spelling errors, or show moderate reliance on quoting vs. original writing and paraphrasing.

0 (0%) – 5 (12.5%)

Postings are well below graduate-level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or show heavy reliance on quoting.

Feedback:

Total Points: 40

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-12 hours? PAY FOR YOUR FIRST ORDER AFTER COMPLETION..

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Do you have an upcoming essay or assignment due?

Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

If yes Order Paper Now

substance abuse assessment

Substance abuse counseling lends itself nicely to the integration of positive psychology and spirituality. While both of these therapy approaches have been explored for many years, the integration into substance abuse counseling is a relatively new development. As such, many clients may not be aware of the techniques in positive psychology and spirituality that can be of use in their recovery.

Juanita has been seeking treatment for her marijuana use from you for a month now. While she has significantly cut back on her substance use, she is having difficulty quitting and remaining abstinent for periods that last longer than a few days. In your counseling sessions, Juanita has mentioned that she feels very badly about herself—she feels guilty about being unable to quit and explains that she doesn’t think she is strong enough to quit altogether. She has also expressed nervousness that her boyfriend would no longer like her if she quit smoking, and she has expressed concern that if he leaves her, she wouldn’t be able to find a new boyfriend because she doesn’t believe she is pretty enough. Juanita is also unsatisfied with her job as a cashier at the local grocery store, but has expressed her opinion that she doesn’t think she is smart enough to get a better job. You know from Juanita’s history, that her mother was very critical of Juanita when she was a child and that her father was absent for most of her childhood. In high school, Juanita excelled at classes in biology and math, but she never attended college.

To help Juanita overcome her barriers to marijuana abstinence, write a summary of what you will cover in your next meeting with Juanita. Ensure that you cover the following points:

  • Explain the concepts of positive psychology to Juanita.
  • Examine the goals of positive psychology and explain how this approach will help Juanita obtain sobriety, focusing specifically on the concerns and dissatisfactions she has expressed.
  • Design at least two exercises based on positive psychology for Juanita to work on in between counseling sessions.
  • Explain spirituality to Juanita, emphasizing the differences between spirituality and religion.
  • Examine how spirituality and positive psychology can work together to help Juanita achieve her goals.

Write a 4–5-page paper in Word format. Use scholarly resources, including the textbook to support your ideas. Apply APA standards to citation of sources. Use the following file naming convention: LastnameFirstInitial_M4_A2.doc.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-12 hours? PAY FOR YOUR FIRST ORDER AFTER COMPLETION..

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Do you have an upcoming essay or assignment due?

Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

If yes Order Paper Now

Some questions about psychological

Please follow the materials to finish this work. The material is already upload.

The Lecture 5/ chapter 6 is about Erikson’s Theory.

The Lecture 6/ chapter 7 is about Allport’s Theory.

About chapter 8 questions:

MCRAE AND COSTA: THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL

From the theories developed by the past trait theorists, Robert McRae and Paul Costa developed a model of personality called The Big Five. The five factors included in the model are neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness, and they are measured by the NEO Personality Inventory. All but agreeableness have been demonstrated to have strong hereditary components. The factors appear to exist across cultures, although different cultures have varying views of which characteristics they believe are most important. The factors also demonstrate the stability of personality, meaning that how you score on each of the factors is not likely to change much over your life – if you score high on extraversion as a young child, you likely will continue to score high on extraversion if tested periodically throughout your life. Much research also has been conducted on the various emotions and behaviors that correlate with the five identified factors, such as testing if there is a relationship between/among neuroticism, feelings of well being, and success in life. With the big five relying on self reports, there is some scepticism over people’s ability to report accurately when giving a self evaluation. As well, the model focuses on stability of personality, but it doesn’t discuss change of personality.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-12 hours? PAY FOR YOUR FIRST ORDER AFTER COMPLETION..

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Do you have an upcoming essay or assignment due?

Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

If yes Order Paper Now