Case Study: “Open Secrets”

Often our political system is criticized for a lack of transparency. Conspiracies are proffered of shadowy interest groups and billionaire donors controlling the system. However, much of the information concerning the funding of, and spending by, candidates, interest groups, and their respective donors is a matter of public record. Most people simply don’t know about or take the time to do this research.

The purpose of this case study is to familiarize you with the process of searching out this information from reliable sources.

The information is out there, you have to look it up. As we look at this information consider the following questions:

• Could this information be clearer?
• What do you need to know to be able to understand this info?
• How has what you learned so far in this course helped you understand this information?

Candidate Data

We can find a bit about the funding and spending of recent presidential candidates. One such website is:

https://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/

Another is from the Federal Elections Commission:

http://fec.gov/portal/presidential.shtml

Explore the various links on these sites. Click on a Candidate’s name for more specific information about their funding and spending. Are you able to find information about how much they’ve raised, who they’ve raised that money from, and how they have spent it?

If not, feel free to ask your instructor for help.

Interest Groups

We can also use these websites to find out about various interest groups.

For example, Planned Parenthood:

https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/summary.php?id=D000000591

Or, Planned Parenthood’s Political Action Committee:

https://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/lookup2.php?strID=C00314617

Or, Right to Life:

https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/summary.php?id=D000000420

Or, National Right to Life’s Political Action Committee:

https://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/lookup2.php?strID=C00111278

Information about these interest groups and other can also be found at the Federal Election Commission’s website via, the “Campaign Finance Disclosure Portal”:

http://fec.gov/pindex.shtml

It is important to note that these examples primarily concern the federal level. Remember states have control over their own state and local elections. A product of federalism is that each state has different requirements and reporting methods. 50 states means 50 different sets of rules. Check with your specific state election authority (typically your state’s Secretary of State) for information about political groups operating to influence politics in your state or local government.

Doing this type of research into political funding and spending is made more complex because interest groups are often made of a network of 501(c)3 non-profit organizations, 501(c)4 non-profit organizations, and other Political Action Committees at both the national and state levels. Sometimes it can help to lookup information based on an organization’s Federal Employer Identification Number.

This type of research can be very challenging but very rewarding. This case study is also an example of using primary sources as much of this information is public record. Primary sources are original or historical texts. They are not the words of another (for example, what you would read in a text book), therefore they are more reliable than secondary sources.

Have you ever played the game telephone? Someone starts a message and tries to relay it to you through several other people before it hits your ears. When you finally do hear the message it often is very different from the original. Instead of getting our information via intermediaries, using primary sources is like getting the message straight from the origin in our telephone game.

Remember, primary research is better than relying on someone else’s word of mouth.

Consistent with Madison’s ideas in Federalist #10, an important part of controlling interest groups and candidates is making sure that the public and competing groups and candidates have free access to this funding and spending information.

W5 Assignment “Party Platform Creation Activity”

American Government I

Party Platform Creation Activity

This week we learned about the important functions of political parties. You also had the opportunity to browse the Democratic and Republican Party platforms for your reading. In this activity, pretend you are in charge of your own political party and write a platform for your political party.

Your platform and reflection essay should be at least 500 words long and address the following:

Part 1 – Your Platform

• Name your party.
• Identify and describe one domestic policy that your party would believe in. Give a paragraph description of that domestic policy. Be very detailed and specific in your description. (Domestic policy is anything that impacts how we live our lives within the borders of our nation.)
• Identify and describe one specific economic policy that your party would believe in. Give a paragraph description of that economic policy. Be very detailed and specific in your description. (Economic policy is all those policies that impact the distribution and exchange of property, wealth, and capital. Think about things that impact money and how much you have and how you can make more.)
• Identify and describe one specific foreign policy that your party would believe in. Give a paragraph description of that foreign policy. Be very detailed and specific in your description. (Foreign policy is how this nation interacts with other nations.)

Part 2 – Reflection Essay

Write an essay in which you compare and contrast each of your three policies, one at a time, to similar policies from the platforms of the Democratic and Republican parties. How are your policies similar to the policies of the two major parties? How your policies different from the policies of the two major parties? Be specific and include specific examples. Conclude your comparison and contrast essay by discussing which of the two major parties your political party most similar to?

Don’t forget to include a reference list.

Please note: APA formatting and citations rules apply to this and all essays in this course.

As with all weekly written assignments, submit your work as an attached file. Double-space your paper and use 12 point Times New Roman as your font.

Health Financial Management Week 4 e-Activity

Share updates about your companies (Medicare & Novartis).

Have they launched a new product? Have they been involved in a scandal? Have they recently been fined for lack of compliance? Are their stocks fluctuating or holding steady?

If nothing has changed, compare different aspects of the companies. Is one stronger or weaker in an area than the other? Is there something on which they could work together?

Note: These are suggested topics; you may discuss any topic related to your companies. As the e-activities will be used for the larger assignments in the course you may want to use these updates as a place to draft your ideas and get feedback.  

Resources:

NASDAQ listing of health care industry companies http://www.nasdaq.com/screening/companie..

Mergent http://www.mergentonline.com.libdatab.st..

Assignment 1, Research Methodology and Studying Groups (15%)

SOCY 100: Introduction to Sociology

Assignment 1, Research Methodology and Studying Groups (15%)

SOCY 100: Introduction to Sociology

Fall 2017

Please
write a 1-2 page essay answering all parts of the following question.
Feel free to use material and ideas from throughout Chapter 9.
However, if you choose to use any direct quotes from the chapter then
please remember to properly cite that material using MLA format.

Your completed assignment must be submitted by 11:59 pm on Sunday December 17. No work after that time will be accepted.

You are not required to complete this assignment. However, if you
choose to submit the extra credit writing assignment then your score on
this assignment will replace your lowest writing assignment or quiz
score from the semester.

Chapter 9 discusses several different approaches to answering
questions concerning the meaning of life. Do you think that any of
these theories can be used to ascribe meaning to our lives and actions?
Why or why not?

Review the following article: http://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/projectmanagement_criticalaccesshospitals_feb2014.pdf.

Based on the information provided in this article prepare a well-written paper that addresses all of the following topics and requirements:

• Identify a project for implementation. This could be a project at your workplace or one based on the articles and readings.
• Identify the stakeholders.
• Describe each part of the project management process.
• Define how your project fits within each part of the process.
• Describe what steps are most critical and most time-consuming, and provide an analysis.
• Describe the measurement criteria you would use to define success.
• Designate any parts of the process that you would change. Why might you do so?

Your paper should meet the following requirements:

• Be 4-6 pages in length, not including the title and reference pages
• Cite 5-7 references. (Remember, you must support your thinking/opinions and prior knowledge with references; all facts must be supported; use in-text citations throughout the assignment and include them in an APA-formatted reference list.