1-2 page long

There are ten questions I need to answer for this essay

I shortly answer the questions, and I need your help to organize it.

Reflection on topic:

1. How did you and your partner come up with your topic? For example, did it stem from personal interests or ideas about what others would find interesting? Did it stem from a “need”, or perceived “need” for the students?

2. Once you facilitated your circle, did the group respond to the topic in the way you thought they would? Was it interesting? Was it a need?

3. What would you change about the topic choice if you were to do another circle?

Reflection on planning:

4. When you planned your circle, what were the different elements you kept in mind? (timing, cultural sensitivities, excitement level, how to include everyone…)

Please name each element” (1,2,3…)“ and say why you thought about those things.

5. For each element, talk about what worked and what did not work.

6. What things did you forget to think about in your plan?

Reflection on facilitation:

7. Before the circle, how did you practice?

8. During the circle, how did you feel, and why?

9. How do you think you can prepare for a future circle, as an active facilitator?

10. Add any other comments or reflections you’d like to, not addressed by the above questions. (you must make a comment to receive points)

Answer

1. It’s was a great experience working with my partner. We were both interested at the topic social media. And we believe it is beneficialto have international students absorb more informations about Americans’ social media.
2. I think people were interested about this topic, and I believe everyone was willing to share their ideas during conversation circle.
3. I would love talk about dating culture in different countries.
4. People’s reaction was one thing I worried about. So I tried to make the power point more attracted and make my lecture more interesting. Another thing is about timing. Our presentation was not long enough, so we found one interesting video, and add more discussion section in it.
5. I think both elements worked out, the students were very exciting and attracted by us. The timing management were fine too, a hour long.
6. No
7. Since It was two of us facilitating the Conversation Circle, We both did some parts of the power point, And we practice the parts that we own did.
8. I was nervous in the beginning, since this is the event that open to anyone who is willing to participate. Then I found out students were interested about our topic. I was getting confident and did well.
9. I absorbed a lot of experience this time.
10. NO.

III. Conclusion: In this section of your essay, you will discuss the impact of historical thinking. Specifically, you should:
A. Explain why this historical event is important to you personally. In other words, why did you select this event to research?
B. Illustrate how your research of the historical event impacted the way you thought about the event. In other words, how did thinking like a
historian change the lens through which you viewed the event? Support your response with specific examples.
C. Explain how a historian would pursue further study of your thesis statement. In other words, if a historian were to continue researching your
thesis statement, what would be the future directions or next steps?
IV. Provide a reference list that includes all of the primary and secondary sources you used to investigate your historical event and support your thesis
statement. Ensure that your list is formatted according to current APA guidelines (or another format, with instructor permission).
V. Communicate your message in a way that is tailored to your specific audience. For instance, you could consider your vocabulary, your audience’s
potential current knowledge of historical events, or lack thereof, and what is specifically important to the audience.

Question:

Write a 350-500 word argument analysis on the attached article, “Should Doctors Tell the Truth?” by Collins, accompanied by a 350-500 word critical discussion of the argument.(2 papers)

An argument analysis is not a summary. Instead, an analysis tells the reader what the main argument of the article is. It should state clearly what the author’s thesis is and how he defends it. What premises does he start from? How does he use these premises to reach his conclusion?

A critical discussion is not a review of an article. Instead, a critical discussion provides an assessment of the main argument of the article. It should raise substantive criticisms of the main argument of the article being discussed. Does the author reason from false premises? Do his premises fail to adequately support his conclusion? Are their potential objections that he does not consider?

• When you claim that a writer said something, tell me where they said it. Both paraphrases and quotes should be accompanied by a page number
• Don’t write as if your audience already agrees with you. Assume your audience is skeptical and you have to convince them.

Read at least two of the following articles to learn more about the PEN-3 model as a framework for planning programs that consider cultural and environmental influences on health behaviors.

Iwelunmor, J., Idris, O., Adelakun, A., & Airhihenbuwa, C. O. (2010). Child malaria treatment decisions by mothers of children less than five years of age attending an outpatient clinic in south-west Nigeria: An application of the PEN-3 cultural model. Malaria Journal,9(1), 354-354. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-9-354

Iwelunmor, J., Newsome, V., & Airhihenbuwa, C. O. (2014). Framing the impact of culture on health: A systematic review of the PEN-3 cultural model and its application in public health research and interventions. Ethnicity & Health, 19(1), 20-46. doi:10.1080/13557858.2013.857768

Naghibi, S. A., Shojaizadeh, D., Montazeri, A., & Yazdani Cherati, J. (2015). Sociocultural factors associated with breast self-examination among Iranian women. Acta Medica Iranica, 53(1), 62-8.

Shahandeh, K., Basseri, H. R., & Sharifzadeh, Y. (2014). An application of cultural model to assess and compare malaria prevention among Afghani migrant and Baluchi resident in the endemic area, southeastern Iran. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 16(1), 102-110. doi:10.1007/s10903-013-9850-4

Yick, A. G., & Oomen-Early, J. (2009). Using the PEN-3 model to plan culturally competent domestic violence intervention and prevention services in Chinese-American and immigrant communities. Health Education, 109(2), 125-139. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09654280910936585

BE SURE TO READ ATTACHED DOCUMENTS BECAUSE ONE IS THE ASSIGNEMNT AND THE OTHER IS A PAST ASSIGNMENT THAT WILL GIVE YOU AN OVERVIEW ON WHAT IS TRYING TO BE PREVENTED

THIS ASSIGNMENT IS 3 PAGES

2-3 REFERENCES SHOULD BE CITED INSIDE THE SCRIPT AND MUST BE INCLUDED ON THE REFERENCE PAGE. REFERENCE PAGE MUST HAVE LINKS SO THAT I MAY CHECK OVER WORK. AND THEY MUST have extensions .edu, .gov, or .org NOT .COM OR ANYTHING ELSE

NO PLAGIARISM

VIEW ATTACHMENTS

(150 word minimum).

1.) Is what Ford did legal or ethical?

Reading through the article seems to give the impression that Ford failed to be legally responsible with its Ford Pinto hatchback automobile, such as crash test results, management deficiency and other red flags, but what Ford did was legal. Ford based its decision on the cost savings to the company, using the risk-benefit analysis. Basically, the cost of repairing the fuel system of all vehicles manufactured was higher that the possible damage that these vehicles could cause to the public. Ford took advantage of the law and saw the opportunity to go forward with the production of its Pinto car because of the benefits of having it out to the public against stopping/fixing all production. Ironically a fine of selling a defective car in California is $50 for first offence and $100 for a second offence, and under federal law, a “violation of automobile safety standards is $1000 per vehicle up to a maximum of $800,000 for any related series of offenses.” (Impact of Law on the Business Environment) In other words, they were going to make more money than what they could be sued for.

2.) If you were in the position of leading Ford Motor Co., would you have fixed the car? If so, how would you justify such an action to those shareholders who insist that you have a duty to maximize profits—especially if the “fix” would involve a major hit to the corporate “bottom line”? What do you think about Milton Friedman’s comments regarding Ford? (Milton Friedman received a Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences.)

If I were in the position of leading Ford Motor Co., I would have fixed the cars immediately after getting the results of the testing of the cars. I would have stopped the vehicle before it was available to the public because it would only take a second to realize that the results were showing that Ford was putting the lives of drivers at risk. As a leader of a company, the ultimate goal is to make the company grow and of course, being profitable. But in this case, I would have justified my action to those shareholders who insists that I have a duty to maximize profits is that as a corporation we simply cannot put a price on the life of an individual. Economically, making the move of fixing the defect was going to impact the “bottom line” of the company, but doing the opposite which was to do nothing, was going to be much worse because it would harm the reputation of the company and we could have been perceived as a company not socially responsible. This could give the perception that we are company that only manufactures cars with the intention of making profit regardless of its safety to the public, in the long term the decision of doing nothing was going to significantly impact the future business operations of the company. I was very impressed with his comments especially when he said that people are very cheap when they have to put a price to their lives, and he used the example of people who decide to smoke. But in the case of Ford, I think people would pay the extra $13 for the fuel system protection if they knew that their lives was safer if that piece was added to it.